Bug 2061291 - annocheck 10.56: misleading error message and outdated man
Summary: annocheck 10.56: misleading error message and outdated man
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: annobin
Version: 37
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nick Clifton
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-03-07 09:58 UTC by Václav Kadlčík
Modified: 2023-12-05 21:05 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: annobin-10.57-1.fc37
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-12-05 21:05:14 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Václav Kadlčík 2022-03-07 09:58:09 UTC
Description of problem:

  # annocheck --skip-all /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so*

  annocheck: Version 10.56.
  annocheck: Warning: '/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6' is a symbolic link.  Run annocheck with -f to follow or -d to ignore.

I believe "-d" is wrong, "-I" is the right option.

The man page is outdated, doesn't mention "-f" not "-I":

  # man annocheck |& grep links


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

annobin-annocheck-10.56-1.fc37.x86_64

Comment 1 Václav Kadlčík 2022-03-07 10:03:03 UTC
sorry for the typo above, should have read:

... doesn't mention "-f" *nor* "-I"

Comment 2 Nick Clifton 2022-03-07 12:22:25 UTC
*sigh*  Yes you are right.  I changed my mind about the name of the option half way through writing the patch.  Originally it was going to be --do-not-follow-links (abbreviated to -d) but there are already a lot of other -d options, so I decided that --ignore-links would be better.

As for the documentation, that is due to laziness on my part.  I documented the long options, but forgot to include the short versions...

Comment 3 Nick Clifton 2022-03-07 12:41:15 UTC
Fixed in annobin-10.57-1.fc37

Comment 4 Václav Kadlčík 2022-03-08 13:38:10 UTC
verified: annobin-10.57-1.fc37

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2022-08-09 13:42:44 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle.
Changing version to 37.

Comment 6 Aoife Moloney 2023-11-23 00:09:47 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 37 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 37 on 2023-12-05.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '37'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 37 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 7 Aoife Moloney 2023-12-05 21:05:14 UTC
Fedora Linux 37 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on None.

Fedora Linux 37 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.

If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.