Just a note: I used gcc-11.2.1-10.el9 for gcc-epel (for e.g. gcc-gobjc) and had to notice that the resulting binaries are LTO 11.3 rather than LTO 11.2; reverting to gcc-11.2.1-9.4.el9 lead to LTO 11.2 binaries again. However, with RHEL 9.1 there will be most likely anyway an update to gcc-11.3.1-2.1.el9, right?

(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #5)
> Just a note: I used gcc-11.2.1-10.el9 for gcc-epel (for e.g. gcc-gobjc) and
> had to notice that the resulting binaries are LTO 11.3 rather than LTO 11.2;
> reverting to gcc-11.2.1-9.4.el9 lead to LTO 11.2 binaries again. However,
> with RHEL 9.1 there will be most likely anyway an update to
> gcc-11.3.1-2.1.el9, right?

That's correct, we plan to update gcc to 11.3 in RHEL9.

adding beta to title

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (gcc bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:8277