Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
Migrating from el7 to el8. Can find the following protobuf rpms:
Installed Packages
protobuf-c.x86_64 1.3.0-6.el8 @rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
Available Packages
protobuf.i686 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf.x86_64 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-c.i686 1.3.0-6.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-c-compiler.i686 1.3.0-6.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-c-compiler.x86_64 1.3.0-6.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-c-devel.i686 1.3.0-6.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-c-devel.x86_64 1.3.0-6.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-compiler.i686 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-compiler.i686 3.5.0-13.el8 codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
protobuf-compiler.x86_64 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-compiler.x86_64 3.5.0-13.el8 codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
protobuf-devel.i686 3.5.0-13.el8 codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
protobuf-devel.x86_64 3.5.0-13.el8 codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
protobuf-lite.i686 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-lite.x86_64 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
protobuf-lite-devel.i686 3.5.0-13.el8 codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
protobuf-lite-devel.x86_64 3.5.0-13.el8 codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
python3-protobuf.noarch 3.5.0-13.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
python3-pure-protobuf.noarch
but can't find protobuf-java rpm.
Need to obtain the protobuf jar file in order to continue migration.
Also, heard about an early version of protobuf containing a bug concerning the byte variable. Was wondering if ver 3.5.0-13 had been fixed.
Thank you very much
Currently we do not plan to have the protobuf-java subpackage in RHEL 8.
Can you use the protobuf java bindings from the maven repository? Can you give some details on how you are using the protobuf java bindings?
For further discussions please open a Red Hat support ticket and mention this bug. Thanks.
Comment 3RHEL Program Management
2023-09-11 07:28:42 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release. Therefore, it is being closed. If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.