Bug 2063351 - amdgpu driver fails to initialize the Ryzen 5600G APU when DPM is turned off
Summary: amdgpu driver fails to initialize the Ryzen 5600G APU when DPM is turned off
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 35
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-03-11 21:03 UTC by Danut Enachioiu
Modified: 2022-12-13 16:59 UTC (History)
19 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-13 16:59:43 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Kernel logs with amdgpu.dpm=0 (showing the bug) (126.03 KB, text/plain)
2022-03-11 21:03 UTC, Danut Enachioiu
no flags Details
Kernel logs WITHOUT amdgpu.dpm=0 (everything works fine, for comparison) (129.05 KB, text/plain)
2022-03-11 21:08 UTC, Danut Enachioiu
no flags Details

Description Danut Enachioiu 2022-03-11 21:03:53 UTC
Created attachment 1865565 [details]
Kernel logs with amdgpu.dpm=0 (showing the bug)

1. Please describe the problem:

I have a system with a Ryzen 5600G APU and a Vega 64 GPU. When the kernel parameter amdgpu.dpm=0 is used, the APU isn't initialized successfully, with a "smu firmware loading failed" error. The Vega 64 is initialized correctly. See "dmesg-bad.txt".

The same system works fine without "admgpu.dpm=0". I will attempt to add a second attachment after filing with logs on a successful boot (Bugzilla doesn't seem to support more than one attachment at filing time?)

2. What is the Version-Release number of the kernel:

Linux fedora 5.16.12-200.fc35.x86_64

3. Did it work previously in Fedora? If so, what kernel version did the issue
   *first* appear?  Old kernels are available for download at
   https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 :

Unsure, just bought this APU.

4. Can you reproduce this issue? If so, please provide the steps to reproduce
   the issue below:

Yes. I believe having a Ryzen 5600G APU is sufficient, but I haven't been able to test without the Vega 64. But anyway: try to boot with a 5600G + Vega 64, then "lspci -k" notice that the APU device has no "driver in use":

30:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cezanne (rev c9)
	Subsystem: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Device 1636
	Kernel modules: amdgpu

Alternatively, connect a display on the APU and attempt to use it.

5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To install the
   Rawhide kernel, run ``sudo dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide`` followed by
   ``sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel``:

I am running Silverblue and I'm not sure how to do this.

6. Are you running any modules that not shipped with directly Fedora's kernel?:

No.

7. Please attach the kernel logs. You can get the complete kernel log
   for a boot with ``journalctl --no-hostname -k > dmesg.txt``. If the
   issue occurred on a previous boot, use the journalctl ``-b`` flag.

Done!

Comment 1 Danut Enachioiu 2022-03-11 21:08:38 UTC
Created attachment 1865566 [details]
Kernel logs WITHOUT amdgpu.dpm=0 (everything works fine, for comparison)

Adding logs from a boot without "amdgpu.dpm=0": everything works fine in this case.

(Side note: I am running with amdgpu.dpm=0 because I experience occasional hangs on my Vega 64 in graphically intensive games without it. It is hard to reliably reproduce, but if you want I can try to file that bug too. This thread by me has more details: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/gpu-hang-how-could-i-investigate-fix-this/20124/10?u=danutsu)

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2022-11-29 18:32:58 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on 2022-12-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '35'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 35 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2022-12-13 16:59:43 UTC
Fedora Linux 35 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2022-12-13.

Fedora Linux 35 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.

If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.