Hide Forgot
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom-1.4-1.src.rpm Description: As its name suggests, [picocom] is a minimal dumb-terminal emulation program. It is, in principle, very much like minicom, only it's "pico" instead of "mini"! It was designed to serve as a simple, manual, modem configuration, testing, and debugging tool. It has also served (quite well) as a low-tech "terminal-window" to allow operator intervention in PPP connection scripts (something like the ms-windows "open terminal window before / after dialing" feature). It could also prove useful in many other similar tasks. It is ideal for embedded systems since its memory footprint is minimal (less than 20K, when stripped).
{Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent - dist tag is NOT present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + License used is GPL + License file LICENSE.txt is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 08fcc5f6bb9e7676a2569386d5ea9f70 picocom-1.4.tar.gz + No duplicate files Not tested package. You need to use macros change /usr/bin/picocom to %{_bindir}/picocom
Looks good! Must fix: - debug package is broken. Just remove the strip command from the spec and let RPM handle it automatically. - RPM_OPT_FLAGS and compiler string are not honored. For example, just add 'CC=%{__cc} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the make command. Also add '%{_smp_mflags}' to make line. - in %files section, use %{_bindir} instead of /usr/bin/ - don't include empty TODO file. Nice to have: - use install instead of cp, to make sure files get correct permissions
Thanks for the review. I put the strip in there because rpmlint was winging about the binary not being stripped. I've removed it and made all other changes. ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom.spec ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom-1.4-2.src.rpm
> I put the strip in there because rpmlint was winging > about the binary not being stripped This usually means you're missing an RPM development package. rpmdevtools, rpmlint or rpm-libs, i forget which one.
Obviously I ha rpmlint :-). I already had rpm-libs, so it must have been rpmdevtools. I've got it installed now, thanks. Sean
MUST items: - rpmlint clean - package names ok - spec follows guidelines - GPL license verified and included - tarball md5sum verified - clean mock build - own its directories - permissions good - no %files duplicates - standard Group: - executable is working - good %clean section I hereby solemny declare this package APPROVED!
(don't forget to build your package and close this bug. thx)