Description of problem:
As of graphviz-2.8-4.fc5, graphviz started depending on X-libraries. I can see
nothing in the changelog indicating any change. If there is dependencies on X,
can this be split into its own subpackage?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
graphviz-2.8-3.fc5 (previous version) didn't depend on the X libraries because
the previous version's package was broken. It was erroneously missing the
/usr/bin/lefty binary, which is built against X:
$ ldd /usr/bin/lefty
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libXaw.so.7 => /usr/lib/libXaw.so.7 (0x0016a000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x00b41000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x00a94000)
libXpm.so.4 => /usr/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x00b27000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x0041b000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x00ab0000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x00d14000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00971000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7f59000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e26000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00d0f000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00d07000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7e21000)
Without this binary, however, many of the programs in graphviz (dotty, lneato)
etc. are non-functional.
The non-graphical versions of these programs (dot, neato) which were included in
the broken package don't rely on X and so it didn't pull in X as a requirement.
I suppose the graphical programs such as dotty, lneato and lefty could be split
out into a subpackage, but upstream doesn't do it that way and graphviz is
inherently a package for generating graphs that are supposed to viewed.
I just reported it partly as a question, since it was a dependency for an
another package - I'm not using it myself. But generally, if there is parts of
the graphviz package that has a use without the X-libraries, the X-dependant
files should be packaged for itself - for use on servers and such.
Taking ownership of this bug, as it's my package now.
I'm somewhat stalling, waiting for Graphviz 2.10; if it doesn't show up soon I
guess I'll be giving the package an overhaul, to see if there are
non-X-dependent components to leave in the main package while splitting off the
X-dependent bits to a subpackage (along with the dependencies).
Alex, Roy-Magne: After some looking, it appears that the only thing in the
package that pulls in the X dependencies is (as Alex hinted) lefty. The
remaining significant dependencies are:
My question (as a graphviz non-user) is, how useful is the package without
lefty? Is it worth splitting lefty off to its own subpackage? If so, any
suggestions on what to call it? graphviz-gui?
I was just looking at the package again today because I need to rebuild it (for
other reasons). I think I'll push this build as-is, and make the changes
if/when I get a good answer to this.
The lack of response makes me suspect this isn't particularly critical. Closing