Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Please branch and build luajit in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain luajit in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luajit/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma).
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84612493
I thought that if a package is in rhel, you are not allowed to package it in epel.
(In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #2) > I thought that if a package is in rhel, you are not allowed to package it in > epel. Ugh, good call. looks like it is in RHEL but not branched then: ``` ~ ⬢ [c9s:2022-03-06] ❯ sudo dnf search luajit Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:40 ago on Tue 29 Mar 2022 05:38:41 AM UTC. No matches found. ``` I'll open a new bug for that. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2069528 ***
per @carl in the EPEL Steering Committee meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-30/epel.2022-03-30-20.00.log.html at 20:56:19 -- if the package is built in CentOS Stream but none of the subpackages are published in any repo, it is still eligible for EPEL and `fedpkg request-branch` will fail if the package is not eligible anyway (I'm going to look at the code to see if we can add a dry-run mode so it can be used to check without actually creating a ticket)
meant to tag, not needinfo, Carl
Update: @
Update: this is now retired properly in Stream 9 anyway: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/luajit/-/blob/main/dead.package
Oliver, will you be able to branch and build luajit in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9. Thanks!
Hi Michel. unfortunately, I do not have the time at the moment to look into this and build luajit for epel9. Sorry, Oliver
(In reply to Oliver Ilian from comment #9) > Hi Michel. > > unfortunately, I do not have the time at the moment to look into this and > build luajit for epel9. > > Sorry, > Oliver Hi Oliver, No worries. As I noted I'm more than happy to co-maintain and so is the EPEL Packagers SIG, but we do need to be added to the ACL https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luajit/adduser for salimma https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luajit/addgroup for epel-packagers-sig Could you add us? also cc the other package admins
Igor granted access, thanks!
*** Bug 2070332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
❯ fedpkg request-branch --repo luajit epel9 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43748
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a3367a878f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.