Bug 207091 – i386 rpms not installed via x86_64 activation keys

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2017-10-23 It is expected to last about 30 minutes

Bug 207091 - i386 rpms not installed via x86_64 activation keys

Summary:	i386 rpms not installed via x86_64 activation keys

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 170877

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	Provisioning (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Mike McCune
QA Contact:	Beth Nackashi
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-09-19 06:42 EDT by Dave Russell
Modified:	2007-10-29 21:59 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-09-19 11:33:47 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Dave Russell 2006-09-19 06:42:39 EDT

Description of problem:
When running RHEL 4 x86_64 many programs they require i386 compatability
packages to be installed.

The format within kickstart for this is <rpmname>.<arch>

e.g.

xorg-x11-deprecated-libs
xorg-x11-deprecated-libs.i386

Should install both 64bit and 32bit versions of xorg-x11-deprecated-libs

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RNN Satellite 4.1.0

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. kickstart an x86_64 machine against an activation key that includes .i386 rpms
  
Actual results:
Observe that the machine will not have the 32bit versions of the rpms installed.

Expected results:
Syntax for kickstart should work for activation keys as well

Additional info:

Comment 1 Dave Russell 2006-09-19 11:33:47 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 170877 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.