When RGW multisite is supported I assume you will stop requiring deployments to pass --yes-i-know to 'cephadm bootstrap'. When this happens, please do not make the deployment fail if --yes-i-know is passed. E.g. I can imagine reverting the original patch which cased BZ 2072665 and then the fix on the tripleo side [1] for 2072665 would cause a new error like: Unrecognized option --yes-i-know This bug requests that --yes-i-know remain a recognized option, even if it doesn't do anything. [1] diff --git a/tripleo_ansible/roles/tripleo_cephadm/tasks/bootstrap.yaml b/tripleo_ansible/roles/tripleo_cephadm/tasks/bootstrap.yaml index 3f39265..6e93578 100644 --- a/tripleo_ansible/roles/tripleo_cephadm/tasks/bootstrap.yaml +++ b/tripleo_ansible/roles/tripleo_cephadm/tasks/bootstrap.yaml @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ {{ tripleo_cephadm_bin }} \ {% if not tripleo_cephadm_default_container %}--image {{ tripleo_cephadm_container_ns + '/' + tripleo_cephadm_container_image + ':' + tripleo_cephadm_container_tag|string }} \{% endif %} bootstrap \ + --yes-i-know \ --skip-firewalld \ --ssh-private-key /home/{{ tripleo_cephadm_ssh_user }}/.ssh/id_rsa \ --ssh-public-key /home/{{ tripleo_cephadm_ssh_user }}/.ssh/id_rsa.pub \
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Severity is set to high since it could break OpenStack customers deploying ceph and I've been asked to set a severity.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1360