Bug 2073209 - [RFE] Enhance the blocklist commands to take a CIDR
Summary: [RFE] Enhance the blocklist commands to take a CIDR
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RADOS
Version: 5.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.2
Assignee: Greg Farnum
QA Contact: Pawan
Akash Raj
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2016497
Blocks: 2102272
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-07 21:59 UTC by Neha Ojha
Modified: 2022-08-09 17:38 UTC (History)
23 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.8-30.el8cp
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Users can now blocklist a CIDR range With this release, you can blocklist a CIDR range, in addition to individual client instances and IPs. In certain circumstances, you would want to blocklist all clients in an entire data center or rack instead of specifying individual clients to blocklist. For example, failing over a workload to a different set of machines and wanting to prevent the old workload instance from continuing to partially operate. This is now possible using a "blocklist range" analogous to the existing "blocklist" command.
Clone Of: 2016497
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-09 17:38:20 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-3951 0 None None None 2022-04-07 22:02:11 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHSTOR-2994 0 None None None 2022-05-27 09:10:33 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:5997 0 None None None 2022-08-09 17:38:54 UTC

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2022-08-09 17:38:20 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage Security, Bug Fix, and Enhancement Update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5997
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.