Bug 207323 - org.eclipse.swt.custom.CLabel missing?
Summary: org.eclipse.swt.custom.CLabel missing?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eclipse
Version: rawhide
Hardware: s390x
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Konrath
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-09-20 17:12 UTC by Andrew Overholt
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-21 03:32:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Andrew Overholt 2006-09-20 17:12:20 UTC
Description of problem:
Attempting to build eclipse-cdt on s390x results in the following error:

    [javac] 1. ERROR in
/builddir/build/BUILD/eclipse-cdt-3.1.0/org.eclipse.cdt.releng/results/plugins/org.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/dialogs/MessageLine.java
    [javac] [reading    org/eclipse/jface/dialogs/Dialog.class]
    [javac] [reading    org/eclipse/jface/window/Window.class]
    [javac] [reading    org/eclipse/jface/window/IShellProvider.class]
    [javac] [567 units compiled]
    [javac]  (at line 27)
    [javac] 	public class MessageLine extends CLabel {
    [javac] 	                                 ^^^^^^
    [javac] The type org.eclipse.swt.custom.CLabel cannot be resolved. It is
indirectly referenced from required .class files
    [javac] ----------
    [javac] 1 problem (1 error)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.2.0-6.fc6

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. make build in eclipse-cdt/devel
  
Actual results:
Build fails.

Expected results:
Build succeeds

Additional info:
Brew task 250509

Comment 1 Ben Konrath 2006-09-21 00:46:28 UTC
Does it even make sense to build CDT on s390x? The CDT has a fragment with
native libs (org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux.x86) and it won't work unless this is
ported to s390x. 

I propose we only build CDT on the arches that upstream supports and revert
eclipse-changelog back to the arches that the CDT supports. What do you think?

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2006-09-21 01:13:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> I propose we only build CDT on the arches that upstream supports and revert
> eclipse-changelog back to the arches that the CDT supports. What do you think?

I think this sounds good.

Comment 3 Ben Konrath 2006-09-21 03:32:05 UTC
Ok, I reverted the update; we only build CDT on these arches again:

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc ia64

I also fixed changelog to only build on this arches and fired off a build.
Closing bug. 


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.