Bug 207443 - Call Trace thrown on screen when network is restarted on bonding
Summary: Call Trace thrown on screen when network is restarted on bonding
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 210577
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Robert Hentosh
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 200812
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-09-21 05:15 UTC by Giribabu Bikki
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-10-23 19:15:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Giribabu Bikki 2006-09-21 05:15:59 UTC
Description of problem:When bonding is started on RHEL5 Beta1, Call traces are
thrown on the screen. But the bond works fine. The failover also happens
successfully. This is seen on mode=1 and mode=6.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):RHEL5-b1


How reproducible:evrytime network restart with bonding


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHEL5 B1
2.Create the Bond with mode=6
3.Restart the network services.
4.Call trace are thrown on the screen.
  
Actual results:call traces are thrown on the screen


Expected results:no call traces are expected on the console


Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2006-10-12 14:02:45 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has requested further review
of this request by Red Hat Engineering.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion in release.

Comment 3 jordan hargrave 2006-10-19 14:56:20 UTC
The bonding drivers will need to run their monitoring threads to run in 
sleepable context.  The way to do this is by using workqueues.  However, all 
spinlocks/read/write locks that may be called by the monitoring threads must 
be changed to use the _bh forms.


Comment 4 John W. Linville 2006-10-23 19:15:13 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 210577 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.