RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2074833 - Oddly packaged systemd cryptsetup plugins
Summary: Oddly packaged systemd cryptsetup plugins
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: systemd
Version: 9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: systemd-maint
QA Contact: Frantisek Sumsal
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2141380 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 2031873 2138081
Blocks: 2064804
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-13 08:30 UTC by Ondrej Kozina
Modified: 2023-05-09 10:33 UTC (History)
18 users (show)

Fixed In Version: systemd-252-3.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2031873
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-09 08:21:58 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-118777 0 None Closed [RHEL7/Leapp/RFE] Cleanup old RHEL7 kernel 2022-05-30 12:17:51 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:2531 0 None None None 2023-05-09 08:22:25 UTC

Description Ondrej Kozina 2022-04-13 08:30:31 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2031873 +++

Description of problem:

Seems that systemd cryptsetup plugins are oddly packaged in systemd-devel sub-package (therefore not installed usually). Not sure what final destination should be, but I have used attached patch to create systemd-cryptsetup-plugins subpackage when I was devel/testing it.

There should probably be some dependencies so that systemd-cryptsetup and systemd-cryptenroll pull the plugins in.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
systemd-250~rc1-2.fc36

--- Additional comment from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on 2021-12-13 20:26:17 UTC ---

Hmm, why create a separate subpackage? I'd just put those files in systemd-udev.
Or in other words, when would you install systemd-cryptsetup-plugins but not system-udev?

--- Additional comment from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on 2021-12-14 18:09:25 UTC ---

I moved those plugins to -udev for now.

--- Additional comment from Ondrej Kozina on 2021-12-14 19:15:31 UTC ---

Ok, thanks! It seems to work just fine.

--- Additional comment from Evan Anderson on 2022-03-13 19:26:17 UTC ---

This appears to be broken again on F36. The systemd-devel package is back to providing libcryptsetup-token-system-* libraries. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=29600259

--- Additional comment from Evan Anderson on 2022-03-13 23:18:50 UTC ---

The issue stems from how the devel regex in split-files.py treats .so files. It assumes that any .so file in a lib directory, with the exception of libsystemd-shared-*.so, are development libraries. The newly added libcryptsetup-token* shared libraries break this assumption. The regex needs to be updated to ignore the cryptsetup libs since those will be picked up later by the matching rule for -udev. I've attached a patch that makes this correction.

--- Additional comment from Milan Broz on 2022-03-14 07:10:06 UTC ---

(In reply to Evan Anderson from comment #5)
> Created attachment 1865807 [details]
> Fix regex for -devel

Can you please reopen the bug then or create a new one? That patch is not in systemd build yet.

--- Additional comment from Ondrej Kozina on 2022-03-16 15:26:09 UTC ---

I can confirm it reappears in systemd-devel package.

--- Additional comment from Evan Anderson on 2022-03-18 02:17:21 UTC ---

Looks like the change messed up the packaging even more. systemd no longer provides libsystemd-shared-250.so, which results in broken dependencies. Culprit looks to be the use of re.match instead of re.search in the change [1], combined with the use of the * instead of .* for the libsystemd-shared matching. re.match only matches from the beginning of the line, and * in regex matches 0 or more of the preceding character (in this case, -).

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/c/0078f9a1029bbfd9dc12e79032072a7ff46182a6?branch=rawhide)

--- Additional comment from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on 2022-03-18 12:41:18 UTC ---

Arrgh. It was late, and I was tired and didn't want to wait for the full build and I thought the change is simple enough to "just work".
Should be fixed with the version that is building now.

--- Additional comment from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on 2022-03-29 20:12:47 UTC ---

This was fixed in F36 and rawhide in the last build.
Comment 1 Ondrej Kozina 2022-04-13 08:32:09 UTC 
I've noticed same issue also in RHEL9 builds recently

Version: systemd-250-6.el9_0
Comment 3 David Tardon 2022-12-07 14:13:42 UTC 
*** Bug 2141380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jan Macku 2023-01-24 13:00:34 UTC 
This issue should be fixed via rebase to systemd v252.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-09 08:21:58 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (systemd bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2531
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.