Bug 2075362 - Review Request: python-qmake2cmake - Tool to convert qmake .pro files to CMakeLists.txt
Summary: Review Request: python-qmake2cmake - Tool to convert qmake .pro files to CMak...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Kadlčík
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-14 01:29 UTC by Onuralp Sezer
Modified: 2023-10-01 21:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jkadlcik: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Onuralp Sezer 2022-04-14 01:29:38 UTC
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/python-qmake2cmake/raw/main/f/python-qmake2cmake.spec
SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/python-qmake2cmake/raw/main/f/python-qmake2cmake-1.0.0~git20220414.7f89f98-1.fc36.src.rpm
Description:  Tool to convert qmake .pro files to CMakeLists.txt
Fedora Account System Username: thunderbirdtr

Comment 1 Jakub Kadlčík 2022-09-24 01:21:57 UTC
Hello Onuralp,
thank you for the package.


> Version:        1.0.0%{?gitdate:~git%{gitdate}.%{shortcommit}}

Wow, what an awful UI the codereview.qt-project.org page has, but it looks like
there are some tags. I can't figure out how to download them, maybe you will be
more successful.

https://codereview.qt-project.org/admin/repos/qt/qmake2cmake,tags


> %{?python_enable_dependency_generator}

We have talked about this in 2070578, I think it is enabled by default and this
line can be removed.


> %description
> %{summary}.

Can you please add a proper description? I think we can use Goals (and
maybe also Non-goals) section from the README.md


---


The package looks like a simple python package but it tries to install many
texlive and perl dependencies, which seems strange. Possibly some bug?

Comment 2 Package Review 2023-09-30 00:45:35 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 3 Jakub Kadlčík 2023-10-01 21:03:39 UTC
> If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore

I am interested in reviewing this ticket but there is no response from the contributor.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.