Please branch and build qtsingleapplication for epel9.
Thanks for your request and sorry for no answer so far.
Maybe you're interested in becoming co-maintainer? I'm not that familiar yet with epel9 as quite new branch still. Is your FAS krege?
My local mock build shows no different with epel8 in building. The qtlockedfile package should be imported first anyway (what is simple rebuild also).
And yes and yes: I'm interested (may be with qtlockedfile both?) and my FAS is krege.
Okay, I've assigned you for both packages. Maybe you would like to generally apply also for membership in kde-sig.org ?
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> Okay, I've assigned you for both packages. Maybe you would like to generally
> apply also for membership in kde-sig.org ?
I'm reading kde@ list but mainly have not enough free time to be deeply involved. The kde-sig@ one is what I missed anyway. Thank you.
qtlockedfile is on the way https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-32c4430b51
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.