Bug 2080106 - Please branch and build qtsingleapplication for epel9
Summary: Please branch and build qtsingleapplication for epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: qtsingleapplication
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-29 02:54 UTC by Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Modified: 2022-06-03 02:58 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qtsingleapplication-2.6.1-37.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-03 02:58:33 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2022-04-29 02:54:37 UTC
Please branch and build qtsingleapplication for epel9.

Comment 1 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2022-05-06 03:38:36 UTC
Ping?

Comment 2 Raphael Groner 2022-05-07 15:16:30 UTC
Thanks for your request and sorry for no answer so far. 
Maybe you're interested in becoming co-maintainer? I'm not that familiar yet with epel9 as quite new branch still. Is your FAS krege?

Comment 3 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2022-05-08 04:34:31 UTC
My local mock build shows no different with epel8 in building. The qtlockedfile package should be imported first anyway (what is simple rebuild also).

And yes and yes: I'm interested (may be with qtlockedfile both?) and my FAS is krege.

Thank you.

Comment 4 Raphael Groner 2022-05-08 06:53:18 UTC
Okay, I've assigned you for both packages. Maybe you would like to generally apply also for membership in kde-sig.org ?

Comment 5 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2022-05-10 04:30:42 UTC
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> Okay, I've assigned you for both packages. Maybe you would like to generally
> apply also for membership in kde-sig.org ?

Thank you!

I'm reading kde@ list but mainly have not enough free time to be deeply involved. The kde-sig@ one is what I missed anyway. Thank you.

Comment 6 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich 2022-05-11 04:29:29 UTC
qtlockedfile is on the way https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-32c4430b51

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-05-25 00:25:59 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-05-26 01:45:33 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-06-03 02:58:33 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c70469ecb3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.