Bug 2084158 - Support provisioning bm cluster where no provisioning network provided
Summary: Support provisioning bm cluster where no provisioning network provided
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Console
Version: rhacm-2.5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: rhacm-2.5
Assignee: Kevin Cormier
QA Contact: Xiang Yin
Christopher Dawson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-05-11 14:34 UTC by Thuy Nguyen
Modified: 2022-06-09 02:12 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-09 02:12:04 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
bot-tracker-sync: rhacm-2.5+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github stolostron backlog issues 22473 0 None None None 2022-05-11 18:43:13 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:4956 0 None None None 2022-06-09 02:12:34 UTC

Internal Links: 2079593

Description Thuy Nguyen 2022-05-11 14:34:01 UTC
Description of problem: Deploy an ocp cluster without provisioning network is not possible in ACM UI 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
To deploy a cluster without provisioning network, the following change should be set in install-config

platform:
  baremetal:
    apiVIP: <api_VIP>
    ingressVIP: <ingress_VIP>
    provisioningNetwork: "Disabled" 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 3 Kevin Cormier 2022-05-11 19:07:54 UTC
@thnguyen Can you please provide the full install-config.yaml that worked for you? I'm wondering if we need to exclude the provisioningNetworkInterface and provisioningBridge values, or any other values. Can we we set provisioningNetwork: "Disabled" as long as the provisioningNetworkCIDR is not provided, or would we need to add a checkbox in the UI?

Comment 5 bot-tracker-sync 2022-05-16 20:58:23 UTC
G2Bsync 1128068687 comment 
 thuyn-581 Mon, 16 May 2022 19:46:38 UTC 
 G2BSync -
Validated on 2.5.0-RC2.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2022-06-09 02:12:04 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management 2.5 security updates, images, and bug fixes), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4956


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.