This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #2074009 I am copying this bug because: Description of problem: After scaling a machineset from 6, back to 0, then to 6, nodes are destroyed and recreated. Northd streams warnings: $ oc logs -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master-xxxxx --tail 4 -c northd 2022-04-09T08:17:32.480Z|01630|ovn_northd|WARN|Dropped 971 log messages in last 61 seconds (most recently, 1 seconds ago) due to excessive rate 2022-04-09T08:17:32.485Z|01631|ovn_northd|WARN|Chassis does not exist for Chassis_Private record, name: 14c78754-ba60-4ab8-a8db-ce0ca34baf5a 2022-04-09T08:18:35.499Z|01632|ovn_northd|WARN|Dropped 989 log messages in last 63 seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate 2022-04-09T08:18:35.505Z|01633|ovn_northd|WARN|Chassis does not exist for Chassis_Private record, name: 14c78754-ba60-4ab8-a8db-ce0ca34baf5a Indeed the chassis are cleaned up the chassis_private record is still there: $ oc exec -ti -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master-xxxxx -c sbdb -- ovn-sbctl list chassis_private 14c78754-ba60-4ab8-a 8db-ce0ca34baf5a _uuid : e76fe362-2223-4dc2-b73c-18c7d1ee783b chassis : [] external_ids : {} name : "14c78754-ba60-4ab8-a8db-ce0ca34baf5a" nb_cfg : 0 nb_cfg_timestamp : 0 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Openshift: 4.10.6 Provider: Azure CNI: OVNKubernetes How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Deploy ocp 4.10.6 on Azure 2. Scale down machineset to 0 then back to initial value 3. OVN warns "Chassis does not exist for Chassis_Private record" Actual results: OVN warns "Chassis does not exist for Chassis_Private record" Expected results: OVN should clean up all unneeded resources Additional info:
*** Bug 2084173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.17 bug fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4882