======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.18-1.2708.fc6 #1 ------------------------------------------------------- init/1 is trying to acquire lock: (&bdev_part_lock_key){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802667ef>] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e but task is already holding lock: (&new->reconfig_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80266425>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x2a/0x2e which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&new->reconfig_mutex){--..}: [<ffffffff802a9667>] lock_acquire+0x4a/0x69 [<ffffffff8026621f>] __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath+0xe4/0x2c0 [<ffffffff80266424>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x29/0x2e [<ffffffff80417534>] md_open+0x2e/0x69 [<ffffffff802e54cd>] do_open+0xa3/0x343 [<ffffffff802e5a0d>] blkdev_open+0x29/0x5c [<ffffffff8021f725>] __dentry_open+0xe8/0x1f5 [<ffffffff80227051>] nameidata_to_filp+0x2c/0x3e [<ffffffff8022914a>] do_filp_open+0x35/0x46 [<ffffffff8021a835>] do_sys_open+0x4e/0xcd [<ffffffff80233d86>] sys_open+0x1a/0x1d [<ffffffff8026094d>] system_call+0x7d/0x83 -> #1 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}: [<ffffffff802a9667>] lock_acquire+0x4a/0x69 [<ffffffff80266648>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xe4/0x261 [<ffffffff802667ee>] mutex_lock+0x29/0x2e [<ffffffff802e549a>] do_open+0x70/0x343 [<ffffffff802e5883>] blkdev_get+0x73/0x86 [<ffffffff802e5552>] do_open+0x128/0x343 [<ffffffff802e5883>] blkdev_get+0x73/0x86 [<ffffffff802e5b0f>] open_by_devnum+0x36/0x46 [<ffffffff8041181c>] md_import_device+0x240/0x267 [<ffffffff80416189>] md_ioctl+0xb4/0x1431 [<ffffffff80348348>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x62/0x78 [<ffffffff803489b9>] blkdev_ioctl+0x65b/0x6b7 [<ffffffff802e4d49>] block_ioctl+0x1a/0x1f [<ffffffff80243db3>] do_ioctl+0x29/0x77 [<ffffffff802326ff>] vfs_ioctl+0x259/0x277 [<ffffffff8024ed14>] sys_ioctl+0x5e/0x82 [<ffffffff8026094d>] system_call+0x7d/0x83 -> #0 (&bdev_part_lock_key){--..}: [<ffffffff802a9667>] lock_acquire+0x4a/0x69 [<ffffffff80266648>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xe4/0x261 [<ffffffff802667ee>] mutex_lock+0x29/0x2e [<ffffffff802e5138>] bd_claim_by_disk+0x73/0x1c2 [<ffffffff80411a55>] bind_rdev_to_array+0x212/0x23a [<ffffffff80413817>] autorun_devices+0x219/0x316 [<ffffffff804161e8>] md_ioctl+0x113/0x1431 [<ffffffff80348348>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x62/0x78 [<ffffffff803489b9>] blkdev_ioctl+0x65b/0x6b7 [<ffffffff802e4d49>] block_ioctl+0x1a/0x1f [<ffffffff80243db3>] do_ioctl+0x29/0x77 [<ffffffff802326ff>] vfs_ioctl+0x259/0x277 [<ffffffff8024ed14>] sys_ioctl+0x5e/0x82 [<ffffffff8026094d>] system_call+0x7d/0x83 other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by init/1: #0: (&new->reconfig_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80266425>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x2a/0x2e stack backtrace: Call Trace: [<ffffffff8026ed0d>] show_trace+0xae/0x336 [<ffffffff8026efaa>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17 [<ffffffff802a7930>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6c/0x77 [<ffffffff802a8eae>] __lock_acquire+0x7c2/0x9d9 [<ffffffff802a9668>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x69 [<ffffffff80266649>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xe5/0x261 [<ffffffff802667ef>] mutex_lock+0x2a/0x2e [<ffffffff802e5139>] bd_claim_by_disk+0x74/0x1c2 [<ffffffff80411a56>] bind_rdev_to_array+0x213/0x23a [<ffffffff80413818>] autorun_devices+0x21a/0x316 [<ffffffff804161e9>] md_ioctl+0x114/0x1431 [<ffffffff80348349>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x63/0x78 [<ffffffff803489ba>] blkdev_ioctl+0x65c/0x6b7 [<ffffffff802e4d4a>] block_ioctl+0x1b/0x1f [<ffffffff80243db4>] do_ioctl+0x2a/0x77 [<ffffffff80232700>] vfs_ioctl+0x25a/0x277 [<ffffffff8024ed15>] sys_ioctl+0x5f/0x82 [<ffffffff8026094e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83 DWARF2 unwinder stuck at system_call+0x7e/0x83 Leftover inexact backtrace:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/29/123
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208732 ***