Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md: considering hde10 ... md: adding hde10 ... md: hde9 has different UUID to hde10 md: hde8 has different UUID to hde10 md: hde7 has different UUID to hde10 md: hde5 has different UUID to hde10 md: hde3 has different UUID to hde10 md: hde2 has different UUID to hde10 md: adding hda10 ... md: hda9 has different UUID to hde10 md: hda8 has different UUID to hde10 md: hda7 has different UUID to hde10 md: hda5 has different UUID to hde10 md: hda3 has different UUID to hde10 md: hda2 has different UUID to hde10 md: created md6 md: bind<hda10> ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.18-1.2708.fc6 #1 ------------------------------------------------------- init/1 is trying to acquire lock: (&bdev_part_lock_key){--..}, at: [<c0613762>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 but task is already holding lock: (&new->reconfig_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0613431>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x21/0x24 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&new->reconfig_mutex){--..}: [<c043bf98>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6b [<c0613270>] __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath+0xbc/0x25c [<c0613431>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x21/0x24 [<c05a724e>] md_open+0x28/0x5d [<c047a159>] do_open+0x8b/0x2f3 [<c047a55a>] blkdev_open+0x1d/0x46 [<c0471a4a>] __dentry_open+0xc8/0x1ab [<c0471b9b>] nameidata_to_filp+0x1c/0x2e [<c0471bdb>] do_filp_open+0x2e/0x35 [<c0471c22>] do_sys_open+0x40/0xb5 [<c0471cc3>] sys_open+0x16/0x18 [<c0403fb7>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> #1 (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}: [<c043bf98>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6b [<c06135f3>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x20a [<c0613762>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 [<c047a12a>] do_open+0x5c/0x2f3 [<c047a430>] blkdev_get+0x6f/0x7a [<c047a1d7>] do_open+0x109/0x2f3 [<c047a55a>] blkdev_open+0x1d/0x46 [<c0471a4a>] __dentry_open+0xc8/0x1ab [<c0471b9b>] nameidata_to_filp+0x1c/0x2e [<c0471bdb>] do_filp_open+0x2e/0x35 [<c0471c22>] do_sys_open+0x40/0xb5 [<c0471cc3>] sys_open+0x16/0x18 [<c0403fb7>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> #0 (&bdev_part_lock_key){--..}: [<c043bf98>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6b [<c06135f3>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x20a [<c0613762>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 [<c0479c8a>] bd_claim_by_disk+0x5f/0x169 [<c05a16ca>] bind_rdev_to_array+0x20a/0x228 [<c05a3571>] autorun_devices+0x1c8/0x29d [<c05a5dea>] md_ioctl+0x104/0x1540 [<c04df7e0>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x49/0x5b [<c04dff06>] blkdev_ioctl+0x714/0x762 [<c0479933>] block_ioctl+0x16/0x1b [<c048317e>] do_ioctl+0x22/0x67 [<c048341b>] vfs_ioctl+0x258/0x26b [<c0483475>] sys_ioctl+0x47/0x62 [<c0403fb7>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by init/1: #0: (&new->reconfig_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0613431>] mutex_lock_interruptible+0x21/0x24 stack backtrace: [<c04051ed>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x16a [<c04057fa>] show_trace+0xd/0x10 [<c0405913>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<c043b10f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x59/0x64 [<c043b898>] __lock_acquire+0x77e/0x90d [<c043bf98>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6b [<c06135f3>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x20a [<c0613762>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 [<c0479c8a>] bd_claim_by_disk+0x5f/0x169 [<c05a16ca>] bind_rdev_to_array+0x20a/0x228 [<c05a3571>] autorun_devices+0x1c8/0x29d [<c05a5dea>] md_ioctl+0x104/0x1540 [<c04df7e0>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x49/0x5b [<c04dff06>] blkdev_ioctl+0x714/0x762 [<c0479933>] block_ioctl+0x16/0x1b [<c048317e>] do_ioctl+0x22/0x67 [<c048341b>] vfs_ioctl+0x258/0x26b [<c0483475>] sys_ioctl+0x47/0x62 [<c0403fb7>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb DWARF2 unwinder stuck at syscall_call+0x7/0xb Leftover inexact backtrace: [<c04057fa>] show_trace+0xd/0x10 [<c0405913>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<c043b10f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x59/0x64 [<c043b898>] __lock_acquire+0x77e/0x90d [<c043bf98>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6b [<c06135f3>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x20a [<c0613762>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24 [<c0479c8a>] bd_claim_by_disk+0x5f/0x169 [<c05a16ca>] bind_rdev_to_array+0x20a/0x228 [<c05a3571>] autorun_devices+0x1c8/0x29d [<c05a5dea>] md_ioctl+0x104/0x1540 [<c04df7e0>] blkdev_driver_ioctl+0x49/0x5b [<c04dff06>] blkdev_ioctl+0x714/0x762 [<c0479933>] block_ioctl+0x16/0x1b [<c048317e>] do_ioctl+0x22/0x67 [<c048341b>] vfs_ioctl+0x258/0x26b [<c0483475>] sys_ioctl+0x47/0x62 [<c0403fb7>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb md: bind<hde10> md: running: <hde10><hda10>
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208732 ***