Bug 2090628 - sometimes a voting member is not added to the etcd-endpoints configmap
Summary: sometimes a voting member is not added to the etcd-endpoints configmap
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2093819
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Etcd
Version: 4.11
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.11.0
Assignee: Allen Ray
QA Contact: ge liu
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-05-26 07:29 UTC by Lukasz Szaszkiewicz
Modified: 2022-07-20 11:22 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-07-20 11:22:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
alray: needinfo-
alray: needinfo-


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lukasz Szaszkiewicz 2022-05-26 07:29:55 UTC
I don't know how common is the issue. It was captured by the scaling test we added. A newly created machine was promoted to a voting member by never made it to the etcd-endpoints configmap.

Timeline:

At 19:37:48: CEO successfully promoted learner member https://10.0.0.7:2380
At ~19:42:33 newly promoted member (ID: 9fc4382989977f7e) was elected as a leader at term 8
At ~19.44:22 the test deleted the machine

The machine was never deleted because the removal controller reads data from the etcd-endpoints configmap which indicated no excessive machines.


Link to CI run: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.11-e2e-gcp-fips-serial/1527713140295340032

Comment 6 Allen Ray 2022-06-22 13:52:44 UTC
After discussing with @tjungblu and @htariq, we decided that this shouldn't be a blocker+ because it isn't perma-failing, currently doesn't have a reproducer, and haven't heard anything from the field.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.