Bug 209140 - Update Eval Mappings w/ Stack
Summary: Update Eval Mappings w/ Stack
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Retired
Component: RHN/Channels
Version: RHN Stable
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bret McMillan
QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 82114
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-10-03 15:30 UTC by Matt Webbink
Modified: 2008-04-21 15:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-21 15:58:41 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Matt Webbink 2006-10-03 15:30:33 UTC
Please update eval mappings to add the Application Stack, per revision # 103235
of rhel-eval-dev-program-mappings.csv.

The mappings need to be tested in qa and pushed to prod by the end of this week
(10/06).

Comment 1 Matt Webbink 2006-10-04 20:55:41 UTC
Please use revision # 103557 of rhel-eval-dev-program-mappings.csv.

Comment 2 Bret McMillan 2006-10-06 15:03:35 UTC
Ran against webqa w/ the following warnings:

Warning: WAR0091 has more than one entry for family solaris.  Setting to 1.
Warning: WAR0092 has more than one entry for family solaris.  Setting to 1.
1042 orgs will be affected by the updates in the file

Please fix the warnings, and I'll re-run against webqa.  Also note that since
this affects orgs, prod-ops will have to make a decision about the production
timing of this change.  I currently can't say how many orgs will be impacted in
prod, need direct access to the prod db for that.

Comment 3 Matt Webbink 2006-10-06 15:15:27 UTC
The warranties have been corrected.  Please use revision # 103680 of
rhel-eval-dev-program-mappings.csv.

Understood regarding re-polling.  I'll communicate to Customer Service.

Comment 4 Matt Webbink 2006-10-09 14:28:06 UTC
Please use revision # 103753 of rhel-eval-dev-program-mappings.csv.  SER0248US
and WAR0313 have been updated to use the rhn-tools-beta channel.

Comment 5 Bret McMillan 2006-10-09 20:12:16 UTC
Matt, I think we need to track 103753 separately, don't we?  rhn-tools-beta
won't necessarily be out there by the time we can get the changes in version
103680 to production.

I'm going to run 103680 against webqa, and if you guys give it the thumbs-up,
I'd prefer to go to prod w/ that.  I'll ask roman to track the rhn-tools-beta
change separately.

Rev 103680 caused a repoll of 1030 orgs in webqa, fyi.

Comment 6 Matt Webbink 2006-10-09 20:18:07 UTC
That's fine.  Please have 103680 pushed to production.

Customer Service has been notified of the repoll.

Comment 7 Bret McMillan 2006-10-09 20:34:43 UTC
RT filed:  https://rt.corp.redhat.com/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=263411


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.