Red Hat Bugzilla – 2092008 – [RFE] While importing chunks again it should proceed with the import instead of giving an error that the "chunks are missing".
Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
1. Proposed title of this feature request
If the import fails for any reason then while re-importing the chunks again it should be copied to the folder again without giving an error that the chunks are missing
2. What is the nature and description of the request?
While importing chunks if it fails for any reason after the chunks have been reconstructed into the single file, then while re-importing chunks again it should proceed with the import instead of giving an error that the chunks are missing
3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
If the import fails for any reason then the reconstructed single .tar.gz file needs to be deleted and copy the data back to the imported file without giving an error.
4. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
While Importing chunks Satellite checks for an already reconstructed file and if it exists, proceed with the import instead of giving an error that the chunks are missing.
5. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?
Unknown
6. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. satellite 7.0)?
No
7. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
No
8. List any affected packages or components.
Unknown
[RFE]
Concur. Fix was released in core/3.28.0, backported to core/3.18.19, 3.21.9, 3.22.6, and 3.23.16.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2173757 ***
1. Proposed title of this feature request If the import fails for any reason then while re-importing the chunks again it should be copied to the folder again without giving an error that the chunks are missing 2. What is the nature and description of the request? While importing chunks if it fails for any reason after the chunks have been reconstructed into the single file, then while re-importing chunks again it should proceed with the import instead of giving an error that the chunks are missing 3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here) If the import fails for any reason then the reconstructed single .tar.gz file needs to be deleted and copy the data back to the imported file without giving an error. 4. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here) While Importing chunks Satellite checks for an already reconstructed file and if it exists, proceed with the import instead of giving an error that the chunks are missing. 5. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla? Unknown 6. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. satellite 7.0)? No 7. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input? No 8. List any affected packages or components. Unknown [RFE]