Please build libiodbc for EPEL9. Needed for glpk. Thank you.
This is also needed for rnnoise, which is needed for mumble. If you do not wish to maintain libiodbc in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package. Myself and Orion are both members of this group. Please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libiodbc/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
Correction, this is needed for poco (not rnnoise), which is needed by mumble.
Second request for build for to add epel-packagers-sig to the package. Thanks.
I've requested [0] access for the EPEL Packagers SIG via the stalled request process [1]. That was completed and now I've requested the epel9 branch [2]. [0] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11090 [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy/#stalled_epel_requests [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/48301
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e415a3fd93 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e415a3fd93
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e415a3fd93 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e415a3fd93 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e415a3fd93 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.