Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2092438

Summary: wrong function entry listed in debuginfo with -fpatchable-function-entry
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: William Cohen <wcohen>
Component: gccAssignee: Marek Polacek <mpolacek>
gcc sub component: system-version QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: unspecified CC: ahajkova, fweimer, jakub, ohudlick, sipoyare
Version: 9.0Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: aarch64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-02 14:41:02 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2087087    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Tarball showing the issue with -fpatchable-function-entry on aarch64 none

Description William Cohen 2022-06-01 14:29:15 UTC
Created attachment 1885810 [details]
Tarball showing the issue with -fpatchable-function-entry on aarch64

Description of problem:
When the  -fpatchable-function-entry is used the debuginfo indicates that the function starts after the nop instructions inserted at the beginning of the function.  This issue looks very similar to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103525


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gcc-11.2.1-9.4.el9.aarch64

How reproducible: every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download the gcc_patchable.tar.gz in this bug
2. tar xvfz ./gcc_patchable.tar.gz 
3. cd gcc_patchable
4. gcc -fpatchable-function-entry=8 -g -O2 -save-temps u32_test.c -o u32_test
5. llvm-dwarfdump  --name="main" u32_test
6. nm u32_test |grep main


Actual results:
The nm states that the function starts at 0000000000400580, but the DW_AT_low_pc states it starts later at 0x00000000004005a0




Expected results:
The DW_AT_low_pc and start of the function reported by nm should match.


Additional info:

This issue was observed  because the RHEL kernels are compiled with 
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS=y.

One of the comments, https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103525#c2 , mentions that a similar issue was addressed on x86_64.

Comment 1 Marek Polacek 2022-06-02 14:41:02 UTC
I've updated PR103525 but it's been in NEW for 6 months, so I think this is not going to be fixed anytime soon.  So it seems appropriate to track this upstream only.