Bug 2093064 - [cee][cephfs] FAILED ceph_assert(dnl->get_inode() == in)
Summary: [cee][cephfs] FAILED ceph_assert(dnl->get_inode() == in)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: CephFS
Version: 5.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.1z2
Assignee: Venky Shankar
QA Contact: Yogesh Mane
Akash Raj
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2074162 2093065
Blocks: 2099589
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-06-02 20:24 UTC by Mike Hackett
Modified: 2022-07-05 06:23 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.7-122.el8cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Ceph Metadata Server no longer crashes during concurrent lookup and unlink operations Previously, an incorrect assumption of an assert placed in the code, which gets hit on concurrent lookup and unlink operations from a Ceph client, caused Ceph Metadata Server crash. The latest fix moves the assertion to the relevant place where the assumption, during concurrent lookup and unlink operation, is valid, resulting in the continuation of Ceph Metadata Server serving the Ceph client operations without crashing.
Clone Of: 2074162
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-30 20:54:48 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 54701 0 None None None 2022-06-06 14:14:48 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-4451 0 None Waiting on Customer [Webscale]Pods will not start with error "failed to configure pod interface: error while waiting on flows for pod: timed... 2022-06-07 23:28:00 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:5450 0 None None None 2022-06-30 20:55:15 UTC

Comment 8 Venky Shankar 2022-06-22 08:57:30 UTC 
Hi Akash,

PTAL at the doc text.
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2022-06-30 20:54:48 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:5450
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.