Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
My recollection is that the original procedure (8.0) was:
1. lvextend --lockopt skiplv LV (on one node)
2. lvchange --refresh LV (on all nodes)
3. gfs2_grow (on one node)
Then the more automated procedure (8.1+) became:
1. lvextend LV (on one node)
2. gfs2_grow (on one node)
For the new procedure, --lockopt skiplv should be removed. The document seems to want to keep some info about the original procedure, though (see step 4.)
Dave: Yes, I left in the 8.0 steps when we did the 8.1 update because not everybody upgrades and the one manual has to cover both procedures. That's been my practice since we stopped having separate manuals for every point release (which was many many years ago), and to the extent I've gotten feedback people seem to want me to keep doing that (it's not, technically, my department's policy -- but support seems to appreciate this).
At this point it might be safe to remove the "for 8.0" versions, but to be consistent I'd like to leave it in. I'll remove the --lockopt skiplv option from the main procedure, noting this as 8.1 and later (the way we do for the refresh part), and note that the 8.0 command as we do for refresh.