Bug 20973 – no backup_active directive mentioned in lvs.cf man page

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 20973 - no backup_active directive mentioned in lvs.cf man page

Summary:	no backup_active directive mentioned in lvs.cf man page

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat High Availability Server
Classification:	Retired
Component:	documentation (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	beta
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Phil Copeland
QA Contact:	Phil Copeland
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-11-16 13:57 EST by Need Real Name
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:29 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-11-17 14:39:46 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Need Real Name 2000-11-16 13:57:12 EST

Tells you that the backup router will not be used because it isn't
activated, but nowhere
does it tell you you need to.
(quick strings on the pulse binary found it)

Comment 1 Phil Copeland 2000-11-17 14:39:43 EST

Nutbunnies...

Ok it was mentioned in the sample.cf file but not in the lvs.cf file
good call I'll go and mercillessly flog myself later over it

Phil
=--=

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.