RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2098352 - [RHEL9] libblockdev part plug-in testing failed
Summary: [RHEL9] libblockdev part plug-in testing failed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2123346
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libblockdev
Version: 9.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Vojtech Trefny
QA Contact: guazhang@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-06-18 11:10 UTC by guazhang@redhat.com
Modified: 2023-02-08 13:09 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-08 13:09:32 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
6731156_12158426.tar (50.00 KB, text/plain)
2022-06-18 11:10 UTC, guazhang@redhat.com 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-125655 0 None None None 2022-06-18 11:11:53 UTC

Description guazhang@redhat.com 2022-06-18 11:10:15 UTC 
Test job https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/6731156  recipe 12158426 have hit error, please have a look if hit a bug 

 job J:6731156 R:12158426 info you can refer: whiteboard common server, x86_64, default kernel, group: integration, distro RHEL-9.1.0-20220615.2 
the test system is hp-dl380g10-06.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com 
 
libblockdev-2.25-12.el9.x86_64


Run testcase  T:146308843  /kernel/storage/storaged/test_libblockdev_package Case hit Error

Taskout link  https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/recipes/12158426/tasks/146308843/logs/taskout.log 


======================================================================
FAIL: test_create_part_with_extended (part_test.PartCreatePartFullCase)
Verify that partition creation works as expected with primary and extended parts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/libblockdev-2.25/tests/part_test.py", line 359, in test_create_part_with_extended
    self.assertEqual(ps4.flags, 0)  # no flags (combination of bit flags)
AssertionError: 128 != 0

======================================================================
FAIL: test_create_part_with_extended_logical (part_test.PartCreatePartFullCase)
Verify that partition creation works as expected with primary, extended and logical parts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/libblockdev-2.25/tests/part_test.py", line 407, in test_create_part_with_extended_logical
    self.assertEqual(ps3.flags, 0)  # no flags (combination of bit flags)
AssertionError: 128 != 0

======================================================================
FAIL: test_get_part_by_pos (part_test.PartGetPartByPos)
Verify that getting partition by position works as expected
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/libblockdev-2.25/tests/part_test.py", line 874, in test_get_part_by_pos
    self.assertEqual(ps3.flags, 0)  # no flags (combination of bit flags)
AssertionError: 128 != 0

======================================================================
FAIL: test_set_part_flag (part_test.PartSetFlagCase)
Verify that it is possible to set a partition flag
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/libblockdev-2.25/tests/part_test.py", line 1122, in test_set_part_flag
    BlockDev.part_set_part_flag (self.loop_dev, ps.path, BlockDev.PartFlag.SWAP, True)
AssertionError: Error not raised

======================================================================
FAIL: test_set_part_flags (part_test.PartSetFlagsCase)
Verify that it is possible to set multiple partition flags at once
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/libblockdev-2.25/tests/part_test.py", line 1240, in test_set_part_flags
    BlockDev.part_set_part_flags (self.loop_dev, ps.path, BlockDev.PartFlag.SWAP)
AssertionError: Error not raised
Comment 1 guazhang@redhat.com 2022-06-18 11:10:20 UTC 
Created attachment 1891027 [details]
6731156_12158426.tar
Comment 2 Vojtech Trefny 2022-06-20 06:35:18 UTC 
fixed in the latest upstream release: https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/pull/742
Comment 3 Vojtech Trefny 2023-02-08 13:09:32 UTC 
The fix is included in the 2.28 release which we rebased to in 9.2 so I am marking this as a duplicate of the rebase bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2123346 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.