Bug 2098692 - F37FailsToInstall: datanommer
Summary: F37FailsToInstall: datanommer
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: datanommer
Version: 37
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miro Hrončok
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON3.11 F37FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-06-20 09:29 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2022-10-04 13:45 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-10-04 13:45:11 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2022-06-20 09:29:49 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (datanommer) Fails To Install in Fedora 37:

can't install datanommer:
  - nothing provides python3.10dist(datanommer-models) needed by datanommer-0.2.0-24.fc36.noarch
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by datanommer-0.2.0-24.fc36.noarch
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.


P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:

    $ mock -r fedora-37-x86_64 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=local install datanommer


P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2022-06-20 10:03:46 UTC
This bugzilla is likely a fallout from the Python 3.11 rebuild.

If your package (or some of the dependencies it has) failed to rebuild during the Python 3.11 rebuild, they now fail to install. To fix this, packages need to be rebuilt in Rawhide.

We will slowly triage the bugzillas, but we'd appreciate your help.

If you know this is blocked by an existing reported build failure or another package not yet rebuilt with Python 3.11, please mark it as such by using the "Depends On"/"Blocks" bugzilla fields. That will help us determine what failures to prioritize.

If this is not Python 3.11 related, please remove the PYTHON3.11 blocking tracker.

Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if you need any help.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2022-06-27 14:54:46 UTC
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2022-07-18 22:27:16 UTC
Hello,

This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-08-09 13:18:19 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle.
Changing version to 37.

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2022-08-17 11:51:44 UTC
This package has been orphaned.

You can pick it up at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/datanommer by clicking button "Take". If nobody picks it up, it will be retired and removed from a distribution.

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2022-08-25 09:25:38 UTC
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2022-08-30 02:36:09 UTC
It was my intention to update these to modern python guidelines and get them building. Unfortunately there were a ton of fires I had to work on last week. 
Hopefully I can work on these this week. 

Any additional help welcome.

Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2022-08-30 08:48:04 UTC
Happy to help with specific questions or a PR review.

Comment 9 Kevin Fenzi 2022-09-11 01:24:44 UTC
So, currently here we have: 

Requirement not satisfied: poetry-core>=1.0.0
Requirement not satisfied: datanommer.models (>=1.0.0,<2.0.0)
Requirement not satisfied: flask-healthz (>=0.0.1,<0.0.2)
Requirement not satisfied: psycopg2 (>=2.9.1,<3.0.0)

Nothing seems to provide poetry-core? Is that dep correct?

Datanommer-models provides python3dist(datanommer-models) = 1.0.4, but not datanommer.models

python3-flask-healthz is 0.0.3

psycopg2 is 2.9.3

Will investigate more.

Comment 10 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-11 17:17:00 UTC
poetry-core is provided by python3-poetry-core-0:1.0.8-3.fc37.noarch

The "Requirement not satisfied" message is describing the not yet installed packages, not what is missing from the repository. Look for the "nothing provides" messages from root.log instead.

datanommer.models *is* datanommer-models, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonDistPEP503ProvidesOnly

Comment 11 Kevin Fenzi 2022-09-11 18:39:31 UTC
Ah yes, that makes more sense. 

DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(docutils) < 0.18~~ with python
3dist(docutils) >= 0.17.1)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(flask) < 2~~ with python3dist(
flask) >= 1.1)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 3: nothing provides requested (python3dist(flask-healthz) < 0.0.2~~ with 
python3dist(flask-healthz) >= 0.0.1)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 4: nothing provides requested (python3dist(pygal) < 3~~ with python3dist(
pygal) >= 2.4)
DEBUG util.py:443:   Problem 5: problem with installed package python3-sqlalchemy-1.4.41-1.fc38.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:443:    - package python3-sqlalchemy1.3-1.3.24-6.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with python3-sqla
lchemy provided by python3-sqlalchemy-1.4.41-1.fc38.x86_64

Comment 12 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-15 15:06:55 UTC
Hello,

This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2022-09-15 15:37:12 UTC
Putting in assigned to stop the needinfo cycle.

Comment 14 Adam Williamson 2022-09-15 23:49:05 UTC
I feel like it's probably fine to let this package get auto-retired. It's effectively been a metapackage since 2012. We probably don't need it any more. Upstream has since changed things such that you can't actually build this any more at all:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/commit/1aeb3c6ec2dc5265d662b24f249435806c603495

Comment 15 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-28 22:28:09 UTC
OK to retire?

Comment 16 Kevin Fenzi 2022-09-28 23:01:39 UTC
Yep. Please do.

Comment 17 Miro Hrončok 2022-09-29 09:27:02 UTC
Retired in f37 and rawhide dist gits.

Keeping open until blocked in Koji.

Comment 18 Miro Hrončok 2022-10-04 13:32:39 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 38.

Thanks for taking care of it!

Comment 19 Miro Hrončok 2022-10-04 13:45:11 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 37.

Thanks for taking care of it!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.