Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). Your package (python-matrix-nio) Fails To Install in Fedora 37: can't install python3-matrix-nio: - nothing provides python3.10dist(h11) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides python3.10dist(pycryptodomex) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides python3.10dist(aiofiles) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides python3.10dist(aiohttp-socks) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides python3.10dist(h2) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.10 needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides (python3.10dist(aiohttp) < 4~~ with python3.10dist(aiohttp) >= 3.7.4) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides (python3.10dist(future) < 0.19~~ with python3.10dist(future) >= 0.18.2) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides (python3.10dist(jsonschema) < 4~~ with python3.10dist(jsonschema) >= 3.2) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides (python3.10dist(logbook) < 2~~ with python3.10dist(logbook) >= 1.5.3) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch - nothing provides (python3.10dist(unpaddedbase64) < 3~~ with python3.10dist(unpaddedbase64) >= 2.1) needed by python3-matrix-nio-0.19.0-3.fc37.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-37-x86_64 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=local install python3-matrix-nio P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
This bugzilla is likely a fallout from the Python 3.11 rebuild. If your package (or some of the dependencies it has) failed to rebuild during the Python 3.11 rebuild, they now fail to install. To fix this, packages need to be rebuilt in Rawhide. We will slowly triage the bugzillas, but we'd appreciate your help. If you know this is blocked by an existing reported build failure or another package not yet rebuilt with Python 3.11, please mark it as such by using the "Depends On"/"Blocks" bugzilla fields. That will help us determine what failures to prioritize. If this is not Python 3.11 related, please remove the PYTHON3.11 blocking tracker. Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if you need any help.
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
Check import: nio Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 171, in <module> main() ^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 167, in main import_modules(modules) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py", line 100, in import_modules importlib.import_module(module) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/importlib/__init__.py", line 126, in import_module return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1206, in _gcd_import File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1178, in _find_and_load File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 1149, in _find_and_load_unlocked File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 690, in _load_unlocked File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 939, in exec_module File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in _call_with_frames_removed File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-matrix-nio-0.19.0-5.fc37.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/nio/__init__.py", line 2, in <module> from .client import * ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-matrix-nio-0.19.0-5.fc37.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/nio/client/__init__.py", line 6, in <module> from .async_client import AsyncClient, AsyncClientConfig, DataProvider ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-matrix-nio-0.19.0-5.fc37.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/nio/client/async_client.py", line 56, in <module> from aiohttp_socks import ProxyConnector ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/aiohttp_socks/__init__.py", line 11, in <module> from .connector import ( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/aiohttp_socks/connector.py", line 9, in <module> from python_socks.async_.asyncio.ext import Proxy ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'python_socks.async_.asyncio.ext' Looks like aiohttp-socks needs an update so that it stops looking for the no longer existing python_socks.async_asyncio.ext module https://github.com/romis2012/aiohttp-socks/compare/v0.6.1...v0.7.1
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle. Changing version to 37.
We are past Fedora 37 Beta Freeze and this package does not even install. What is the plan wrt this package? Can it please be removed from the distribution until this is solved?
No, this package will not be removed. It's FTI because a dependent package, python-aiohttp-socks, has not been updated. I've even opened a PR there and I'm waiting for the maintainers to say yes/no so I can proceed. There's not much else I can do here. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiohttp-socks/pull-request/5 I appreciate keeping the distribution clean by removing unmaintained packages, but let's not jump to "please remove all FTI packages". This package is maintained and will remain.
OK, I see you are on top of things. It was not obvious from this bugzilla which was not updated. Honestly, I would not expect any update from python-aiohttp-socks maintainers.
Thanks. I was hoping to not use provenpackager powers to push through the update to python-aiohttp-socks, but I guess I've waited long enough now and not a response. I'll merge the PR etc. and fix this ASAP.
FEDORA-2022-8261ca41f5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8261ca41f5
FEDORA-2022-8261ca41f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-8261ca41f5` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8261ca41f5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 38. Thanks for taking care of it!
+5 in https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/876 , marking accepted.
FEDORA-2022-8261ca41f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.