Hi. I'm not interested in epel packages but if you want to, I can request the branch and give you the permissions to maintain python-zipp there. What do you think?

I'm requesting this on behalf of other users in my company, to help facilitate a rhel8->rhel9 migration. So I only have a secondhand interest in this, and not enough to maintain it unfortunately. 
I believe most of our python3-zipp installations are because of dependency from python3-importlib-metadata.

@(In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #1)
> Hi. I'm not interested in epel packages but if you want to, I can request
> the branch and give you the permissions to maintain python-zipp there. What
> do you think?

Lumir, I need this to package python3-importlib-metadata for EPEL9, and am already a packager, so I'm willing to take it on.

If you can request a branch for EPEL9 and give me permissions, I'll build it.  My FAS is frankcrawford

Branch request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/46786

Frank, you are now a collaborator so when the branch appears, everything should work.

Thank you.

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-688722cf1e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-688722cf1e

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-688722cf1e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-688722cf1e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-688722cf1e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.