Bug 2099997
| Summary: | Adding a new ISCSI storage connection you always get tpgt=1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Avihai <aefrat> | ||||
| Component: | BLL.Storage | Assignee: | Arik <ahadas> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Avihai <aefrat> | ||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 4.5.1 | CC: | bugs | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2022-06-27 14:22:20 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Avihai
2022-06-22 07:22:12 UTC
Avihai, considering that bz 2099640 moved to ovirt-engine and that it shouldn't have been reported on RHV, is there a reason to keep this one or close as duplicated? Hi Arik, This new bug was requested by @Nir and I agree with it. From my and Nir's understanding: bug 2099640 should fix engine behavior of user adding the wrong tgpt value(via UI/API/Ansible) - we don't want host to become non-operational. This bz is about fixing storage connection feature which currently any new added storage connection is added with tpgt=1. I think having a separate bug is the right and more clear way to resolve each issue separately , but I leave final decision up to you ofcs. sorry, I still don't understand we have three bugs: 1. that should prevent the host from becoming non-operational by VDSM not reporting an error on duplicate connections 2. bug on Ansible 3. bug on Webadmin so you say that 2 and 3 are unrelated to the source that the request comes from but whether tgpt was manually specified or not? I didn't see any indication that someone explicitly specified incorrect tgpt on those bugs so if that's the case, then they need to be updated - first to reflect the manual specification of tgpt and second, move both to ovirt-engine or do you mean this is an RFE to be able to specify tgpt from the UI? (In reply to Arik from comment #3) > sorry, I still don't understand > we have three bugs: > 1. that should prevent the host from becoming non-operational by VDSM not > reporting an error on duplicate connections > 2. bug on Ansible > 3. bug on Webadmin > > so you say that 2 and 3 are unrelated to the source that the request comes > from but whether tgpt was manually specified or not? Not sure I follow the question but after the discussion we have I hope it's cleared up. > I didn't see any indication that someone explicitly specified incorrect tgpt > on those bugs so if that's the case, then they need to be updated - first to > reflect the manual specification of tgpt and second, move both to > ovirt-engine After our discussion we agreed that user should not be able to add the ISCSI portal/tgpt and engine should do that as it does when adding a new storage domain via the discovery. This change can be resolved in this bug. Changing Expected results: User should see in the engine DB and host ISCSI node DB the real ISCSI portal/tgpt and not automatically portal/tgpt =1. Similar flow to that described in bz 2099640 but from the webadmin - if we introduce a fix on the backend side, it should cover both flows *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2099640 *** |