This is a tracking bug for Change: RPM Macros for Build Flags For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMMacrosForBuildFlags Create a corresponding macro for each compiler flag in the redhat-rpm-config macro file and create "extra flag" macros to make it easier for packages to add and remove compiler flags. If you encounter a bug related to this Change, please do not comment here. Instead create a new bug and set it to block this bug.
The proposal for this Change indicated a contingency deadline of "mass rebuild", which is scheduled to begin tomorrow. Is this Change ready or does it need to be deferred to F38?
I submitted the pull request here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/208 It seems unlikely it will be merged in time.
Today we reached the Code Complete (Testable) milestone on the F37 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html At this time, all F37 Changes should be complete enough to be testable. You can indicate this by setting this tracker to the MODIFIED status. If the Change is 100% code complete, you can set the tracker to ON_QA. If you need to defer this Change to F38, please NEEDINFO me. Changes that have not reached at least the MODIFIED status will be given to FESCo for evaluation of contingency plans.
Deferring to F38 since the necessary PR is still pending.
Today we reached the Code Complete (Testable) milestone on the F38 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html At this time, all F38 Changes should be complete enough to be testable. You can indicate this by setting this tracker to the MODIFIED status. If the Change is 100% code complete, you can set the tracker to ON_QA. If you need to defer this Change to F39, please NEEDINFO me. Changes that have not reached at least the MODIFIED status will be given to FESCo for evaluation of contingency plans.
I'm waiting on review/merge for https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/233.
Since the contingency plan lists "mass rebuild" as the contingency date, should we defer this to F39?
I think "mass rebuild" contingency date is a mistake, left over from the previous version of the proposal, which was more invasive. I think it should be safe to merge the patch still.
PR is merged, setting to MODIFIED. If it is 100% code complete now, you can set this to ON_QA.
Today we reached the Code Complete (100% complete) milestone on the F38 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html At this time, all F38 Changes should be 100% complete. You can indicate this by setting this tracker to the ON_QA status. If you need to defer this Change to F39 please NEEDINFO me. Note that we are entering the Beta freeze. Additional package changes to complete this Change will need an approved blocker or freeze exception. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process for more information. Changes that have not reached the ON_QA status will be given to FESCo for evaluation of contingency plans.
From the FESCo ticket, I understand this to be complete. Setting to ON_QA. If this is wrong, please let me know ASAP. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2958#comment-845168
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days