Bug 2103473 - Review Request: meshcommander - Intel AMT management console [NEEDINFO]
Summary: Review Request: meshcommander - Intel AMT management console
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://www.meshcommander.com/meshcom...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-07-03 16:47 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2025-06-03 00:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
package-review: needinfo? (davide)


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6155105 to 7522375 (600 bytes, patch)
2024-06-02 22:02 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Davide Cavalca 2022-07-03 16:47:43 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/meshcommander/meshcommander.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/meshcommander/meshcommander-0.9.5~a-1.fc37.src.rpm

Description:
MeshCommander is an entirely web based remote management tool for Intel AMT
computers. Built-in support for KVM, SOL and IDE-R along with logs,
configuration options and much more means you have full access to Intel AMT
features in a single place.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-03 16:47:45 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89034101

Comment 2 Package Review 2023-07-04 00:45:33 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2023-07-09 15:42:08 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6155105
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2103473-meshcommander/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06155105-meshcommander/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2024-06-02 22:02:40 UTC
Created attachment 2036085 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6155105 to 7522375

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2024-06-02 22:02:42 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7522375
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2103473-meshcommander/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07522375-meshcommander/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE-MIT is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Package Review 2025-06-03 00:45:18 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.