Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2109740 - [RFE] Red Hat Satellite and Capsule 6 should have support for fapolicyd
Summary: [RFE] Red Hat Satellite and Capsule 6 should have support for fapolicyd
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Installation
Version: 6.11.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: 6.15.0
Assignee: Eric Helms
QA Contact: Jameer Pathan
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2120317 2155969 2234503 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-07-22 00:03 UTC by Ganesh Payelkar
Modified: 2024-09-18 12:33 UTC (History)
26 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-04-23 17:12:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-15991 0 None None None 2023-02-16 16:22:50 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 3198782 0 None None None 2022-07-22 00:06:48 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 6970341 0 None None None 2022-08-02 18:29:08 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:2010 0 None None None 2024-04-23 17:12:34 UTC

Description Ganesh Payelkar 2022-07-22 00:03:35 UTC 
Description of problem:

[RFE]  Red Hat Satellite and Capsule 6 should have hardening support for standards such as DISA/CIS/STIG

satellite provides openscap to help ensure that managed nodes are in compliance with PCI-DSS / STIG and many other standards, it would be really nice if we could get compliance standards applied for Satellite itself.

Currently, we can install Red Hat Satellite 6 or Red Hat Satellite Capsule 6 on a FIPS-enabled RHEL system. 


Does Red Hat Satellite 6 and Red Hat Satellite Capsule 6 support hardening?
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3198782
Comment 7 Eric Helms 2023-03-09 15:08:50 UTC 
*** Bug 2155969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Eric Helms 2023-08-28 20:05:34 UTC 
*** Bug 2234503 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Eric Helms 2023-09-06 00:36:40 UTC 
*** Bug 2120317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Brad Buckingham 2023-10-30 11:29:29 UTC 
Bulk setting Target Milestone = 6.15.0 where sat-6.15.0+ is set.
Comment 20 Eric Helms 2024-03-04 18:52:14 UTC 
The approach being taken to support this RFE is that Satellite deployments will support fapolicyd running, and, similar to our FIPS policy, will support the underlying OS meeting STIG standards. We are not, with this initial set of work, supporting the application meeting STIG standards just we do not support FIPS being enabled for each of the application services that compose Satellite. That is, just as we support FIPS-enabled RHEL we will support fapolicyd-enabled RHEL. If users need additional requirements on top of this that would apply to the application layers then those should be raised as a separate RFE to consider.
Comment 24 errata-xmlrpc 2024-04-23 17:12:31 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.15.0 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2010
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.