Bug 2112768 - [cephadm] "_no_schedule" label doesn't work with explicit host placement in the service spec.
Summary: [cephadm] "_no_schedule" label doesn't work with explicit host placement in t...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.0
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Mohit Bisht
Masauso Lungu
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2112767 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 2126050
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-08-01 05:32 UTC by Mohit Bisht
Modified: 2023-03-20 18:57 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-17.2.3-24.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Users can now drain hosts that are listed in explicit placements Previously, draining hosts that were listed as part of an explicit placement would cause the hosts not to be properly drained and tracebacks would be logged until the drain was stopped or hosts were removed from any explicit placement . With this fix, the handling of explicit placements is implemented internally and `cephadm` is able to determine if it needs to remove daemons from the hosts. Consequently, users can now drain hosts that are listed as part of an explicit placement without having to first remove the host from the placement. However, users still need to remove the host from any explicit placement before removing the host fully or specifications that explicitly list the host cannot be applied.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-20 18:57:13 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-4974 0 None None None 2022-08-01 05:41:45 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:1360 0 None None None 2023-03-20 18:57:55 UTC

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2022-08-01 05:32:53 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 3 Mohit Bisht 2022-08-01 05:39:41 UTC
*** Bug 2112767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2023-03-20 18:57:13 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 6.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:1360


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.