RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2112873 - unexpand cannot process form feed [rhel-8]
Summary: unexpand cannot process form feed [rhel-8]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: coreutils
Version: 8.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Kamil Dudka
QA Contact: Radka Brychtova
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2112985
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-08-01 11:30 UTC by Jonathan Wakely
Modified: 2023-05-16 11:00 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: coreutils-8.30-14.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2112870
: 2112985 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-05-16 09:03:35 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-129774 0 None None None 2022-08-01 11:41:31 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2023:2960 0 None None None 2023-05-16 09:03:37 UTC

Description Jonathan Wakely 2022-08-01 11:30:07 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2112870 +++

Description of problem:

$ printf '\f'  | unexpand 
unexpand: input line is too long


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

coreutils-8.30-12.el8.x86_64


How reproducible:

Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. printf '\f'  | unexpand 

Actual results:

unexpand: input line is too long

Expected results:

No error.

Additional info:

This seems to be a Fedora/RHEL bug, because it works fine on Ubuntu and Debian, and works fine on  BSD, Solaris and AIX.

Working versions

coreutils-8.22-24.el7_9.2.x86_64 (CentOS 7)
8.26-3 (Debian 9.13 stretch)
8.28-1ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 18.04)
8.32-4.1ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 22.04)
8.32-4.1 (Debian unstable sid)
9.1.43-ab976f (self-built from coreutils Git repo)

Not working versions:

coreutils-8.30-12.el8.x86_64 (CentOS 8.6)
coreutils-8.30-13.el8.x86_64 (CentOS 8 stream)
coreutils-9.0-5.fc36.x86_64 (Fedora 36)

--- Additional comment from Jonathan Wakely on 2022-08-01 11:25:50 UTC ---

Also broken:

coreutils-9.1-3.fc37.x86_64
coreutils-8.32-32.fc34.x86_64
coreutils-8.32-33.fc35.x86_64
coreutils-8.32-32.el9.x86_64


Using LANG=C doesn't change anything.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2023-05-16 09:03:35 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (coreutils bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2960


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.