rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f37 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89897614 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild Please fix rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 38, rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Created attachment 1902486 [details] build.log
Created attachment 1902487 [details] root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Created attachment 1902488 [details] state.log
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle. Changing version to 37.
I think this FTBFS could be fixed by the following patch: https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-pdf/commit/0fc983c86cdf49f0ce46618aab67e765e32ee0db The specific issue seems to be caused by error_highlight gem newly introduced in Ruby 3.1.
@vondruch do you think the patch for the converter.rb is the key? I had a look to the commit and not clear how that would fix it, going to give it a try but to be honest I think we should probably push this package at least to 2.0.0.
(In reply to Sergi from comment #6) > @vondruch do you think the patch for the converter.rb is the key? > I had a look to the commit and not clear how that would fix it, going to > give it a try but to be honest Yes, it is. I had long discussion about it with upstream here [1], but I don't think it is worth of reading ;) > I think we should probably push this package > at least to 2.0.0. This should also help, yes. Probably easier way. [1]: https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-pdf/issues/2336
Seems the patch worked for rawhide [0], will try tomorrow to get a build for f37 and report back.
(In reply to Sergi from comment #8) > Seems the patch worked for rawhide [0], will try tomorrow to get a build for > f37 and report back. [0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91844275
FEDORA-2022-d07717bac8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d07717bac8
FEDORA-2022-d07717bac8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-d07717bac8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d07717bac8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
(In reply to Sergi from comment #8) > Seems the patch worked for rawhide [0], will try tomorrow to get a build for > f37 and report back. Great! BTW you have missed Rawhide / F38 build which ideally should have been out first.
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #12) > (In reply to Sergi from comment #8) > > Seems the patch worked for rawhide [0], will try tomorrow to get a build for > > f37 and report back. > > Great! > > BTW you have missed Rawhide / F38 build which ideally should have been out > first. Thanks for the catch. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e7040d654
Thx a lot 👍
FEDORA-2022-d07717bac8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.