Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/squidclamav.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/squidclamav-7.2-2.fc36.src.rpm Description: SquidClamav is an antivirus for the Squid proxy based on the ICAP protocol and the awards-winning ClamAv anti-virus toolkit. Using it will help you secure your home or enterprise network web traffic. SquidClamav is the most efficient antivirus tool for HTTP traffic available for free, it is written in C as a c-icap service and can handle several thousands of connections at once. Fedora Account System Username: slaanesh
Depends on: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2119983 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2119984
@negativo17 I found one issue that will need to be updated: > Issues: > ======= > - No %config files under /usr. > Note: %config(noreplace) /usr/libexec/squidclamav/clwarn.cgi > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_configuration_files It needs to be %file I guess. and > squidclamav.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/squidclamav/NEWS Although I guess that is an upstream issue. Secondly, it may be better to switch to the github repo, which is getting patched, https://github.com/darold/squidclamav
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.
Got some issues at work, picking this up again now.
Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/squidclamav.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/squidclamav-7.2-3.fc38.src.rpm * Thu Sep 28 2023 Simone Caronni <negativo17> - 7.2-3 - Review fixes. https://github.com/scaronni/squidclamav/commit/cbefbd8e9b662fc1a9ef6dd8ac91a332fc1cc506
Simone, I've done an initial review and the only real issue is with the licensing. There are two issues, one of which is in the spec file and the other upstream. Firstly, reading the copyrights,the license should be "GPL-3.0-or-later". However, second, the bigger issue is that the COPYING file is just the header info, not the correct file from upstream. We need to raise this upstream, but do you want to raise it, or do you want me to do it?
(In reply to Frank Crawford from comment #6) > Simone, > > I've done an initial review and the only real issue is with the licensing. > There are two issues, one of which is in the spec file and the other > upstream. > > Firstly, reading the copyrights,the license should be "GPL-3.0-or-later". > > However, second, the bigger issue is that the COPYING file is just the > header info, not the correct file from upstream. We need to raise this > upstream, but do you want to raise it, or do you want me to do it? Created the issue here: https://github.com/darold/squidclamav/issues/69 Shall we bundle the fsf file in place of the provided one or wait?
I would recommend replacing hand-written version in Source0 to use %{version} also the second time. Unless I am mistaken %{_libexecdir}/%{name}/ directory is not owned by the package. At least %dir %{_libexecdir}/%{name}/ should be present. Similarly %{_datadir}/c_icap/templates/squidclamav/ should be included also with directory, not only all its files. Remove * at the end of that line. On the other hand use %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* instead of fixed .gz suffix for a man page. %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/%{name}.conf needs Requires: httpd-filesystem to have the directory owned.
Simone, following on with what is in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/ I'd suggest we currently package the correct license, but may drop it later if he updates it. Obviously see the notes from Petr above.
Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/squidclamav.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/squidclamav-7.2-4.fc38.src.rpm * Thu Oct 19 2023 Simone Caronni <negativo17> - 7.2-4 - Review fixes; bundle external GPL license file: https://github.com/darold/squidclamav/issues/69 https://github.com/scaronni/squidclamav/commit/dd94ba739e3337a5941fff76825d11c4c1e4d8b6?diff=split
Force pushed a last minute change, diff is here: https://github.com/scaronni/squidclamav/commit/46c8a888d6a439d6d54f54083f7cc117b74a5e41
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6546491 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2119985-squidclamav/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06546491-squidclamav/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
I'm approving this, although for completeness, here are the responses about listed issues, all of which are warnings: > squidclamav.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so Warning only. > squidclamav.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so /lib64/libz.so.1 > squidclamav.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so /lib64/libbz2.so.1 Warning only, but is required for dynamic linking. > squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so CI_DEBUG_LEVEL (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) > ... Warning only, but are defined in c-icap libraries, and resolved during dynamic linking.
APPROVE. See review above. --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Sources not installed [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 58947 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. Note: Upstream is currently distributing incorrect LICENSE file. Reported as issue #69. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: squidclamav-7.2-4.fc40.x86_64.rpm squidclamav-debuginfo-7.2-4.fc40.x86_64.rpm squidclamav-debugsource-7.2-4.fc40.x86_64.rpm squidclamav-7.2-4.fc40.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpqrgqotmz')] checks: 31, packages: 4 squidclamav.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: squidclamav-debuginfo-7.2-4.fc40.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpwtntyy3x')] checks: 31, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 squidclamav.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so /lib64/libz.so.1 squidclamav.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so /lib64/libbz2.so.1 squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so CI_DEBUG_LEVEL (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so CI_DEBUG_STDOUT (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so __log_error (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_membuf_new_sized (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_http_response_reset_headers (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_service_data (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_service_set_transfer_preview (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_txt_template_build_content (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_object_pool_unregister (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_membuf_write (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_icap_add_xheader (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_object_pool_alloc (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_simple_file_write (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_http_response_create (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_service_set_preview (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_simple_file_unlock_all (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_http_content_length (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_buffer_free (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_req_unlock_data_non_inline (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_membuf_free (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_membuf_read (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_service_enable_204 (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_simple_file_destroy (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_http_response_headers (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_req_hasbody_non_inline (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_membuf_attr_get (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_simple_file_new (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_object_pool_register (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_service_set_istag (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_http_response_add_header (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_object_pool_free (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so register_command (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_headers_value (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_req_allow204_non_inline (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_req_sent_data_non_inline (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_simple_file_read (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_buffer_alloc (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_service_set_xopts (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_http_request_headers (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so ci_req_hasalldata_non_inline (/usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so) squidclamav.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 43 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- squidclamav: /usr/lib64/c_icap/squidclamav.so Source checksums ---------------- https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 3972dc9744f6499f0f9b2dbf76696f2ae7ad8af9b23dde66d6af86c9dfb36986 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3972dc9744f6499f0f9b2dbf76696f2ae7ad8af9b23dde66d6af86c9dfb36986 https://github.com/darold/squidclamav/archive/v7.2.tar.gz#/squidclamav-7.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6470be4fd084474c7fe1c133894b29574ef06c1a264287298bfd96fb8444b426 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6470be4fd084474c7fe1c133894b29574ef06c1a264287298bfd96fb8444b426 Requires -------- squidclamav (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/perl c-icap config(squidclamav) httpd-filesystem libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) squid squidclamav-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): squidclamav-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- squidclamav: config(squidclamav) squidclamav squidclamav(x86-64) squidclamav-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) squidclamav-debuginfo squidclamav-debuginfo(x86-64) squidclamav-debugsource: squidclamav-debugsource squidclamav-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2119985 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: fonts, Perl, Java, PHP, Ocaml, Python, SugarActivity, Haskell, R Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
@negativo17 sorry it was too late to be part of the F39 release, but it should be able to be come out soon after.
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/squidclamav
Packages are being built, I've added you as an admin to the package. Something went wrong when requesting the epel9 branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57940#comment-882319 What's the process here?
well it fixed itself.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4e1293686 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4e1293686
FEDORA-2023-0afec59ff5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0afec59ff5
FEDORA-2023-0afec59ff5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-0afec59ff5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0afec59ff5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-449e1ebe86 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-449e1ebe86 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-449e1ebe86 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-9ee64e2ca1 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-9ee64e2ca1 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9ee64e2ca1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f379ccb616 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f379ccb616 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4e1293686 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4e1293686 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b48258af09 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b48258af09 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-9ee64e2ca1 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2023-449e1ebe86 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f379ccb616 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4e1293686 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b48258af09 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2023-0afec59ff5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.