Bug 21200 – exclusivearch should add i586, i686, and athlon

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 21200 - exclusivearch should add i586, i686, and athlon

Summary:	exclusivearch should add i586, i686, and athlon

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification:	Retired
Component:	sndconfig (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	1.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:	Dale Lovelace
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-11-21 15:26 EST by Chris Runge
Modified:	2014-03-16 22:17 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-11-21 17:05:36 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Chris Runge 2000-11-21 15:26:53 EST

the .spec file needs to be altered to rebuild as i586, i686, or athlon due
to the exclusivearch line

while RH doesn't generally build specifically for these platforms, others
may and there is nothing that makes this package i386 only

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2000-11-21 15:39:42 EST

I suppose. There's absolutely no reason to build it for any
other arch though.

Look, that newt box popped up .00000000001 seconds faster! :)

Comment 2 Chris Runge 2000-11-21 17:05:33 EST

it isn't so much for trying to speed up this one particular application, as for 
rebuilding a slew of SRPMS for a different target -- adding in these other 
archs prevents and error from appearing, that's all

in other words, it would be nice to change/fix this in other SRPMS that have 
the same problem

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2001-01-30 19:33:58 EST

Fixed in cvs, will be in next build.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.