Description of problem: Requesting a epel9 of clinfo Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: fedpkg scratch-build --target epel9 Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91095440 Expected results: Additional info: Add me to project if you want help.
It has been a month, do you need help ?
I have no idea, why I am on this bug. I have left Red Hat couple of years ago, I don’t have this package registered in src.fedoraproject.org, and I don’t want to bother with the mess of this Bugzilla any more.
the owner of clinfo for EPEL is mcepl maybe its time to orphan all mcepl packages? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clinfo @trix only the owner can request the branch, so I cannot help from here.
(In reply to Filipe Rosset from comment #3) > maybe its time to orphan all mcepl packages? I do care about these four packages https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/mcepl/projects (and they are mostly dead), but anything else I really don’t care about.
resetting to orphan this package
@Matěj Cepl Can you "give" the package to Tom (FAS account: trix) as you are still the "EPEL maintainer" according to pagure It should just be a matter to edit the bugzilla assigne for EPEL to trix in the bottom left side of this page https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clinfo Unless "Filipe Rosset" can edit the bugzilla assignee himslef ? Also if Tom is taking the EPEL branch, he should be added to co-maintainer (as an admin or else) I guess... Thanks for working on having clinfo on EPEL9...
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #6) > Can you "give" the package to Tom (FAS account: trix) as you are still the > "EPEL maintainer" according to pagure > It should just be a matter to edit the bugzilla assigne for EPEL to trix in > the bottom left side of this page https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clinfo I cannot edit the bottom left side.
Requested epel9 branch here -> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49134
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-626622c523 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-626622c523
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fee6f8cecf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fee6f8cecf
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fee6f8cecf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fee6f8cecf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-626622c523 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-626622c523 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
> rpm -q clinfo clinfo-3.0.21.02.21-4.el9.x86_64 > clinfo Number of platforms 1 Platform Name NVIDIA CUDA Platform Vendor NVIDIA Corporation Platform Version OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.8.88 Platform Profile FULL_PROFILE ... Looks reasonable. Thanks!
Thanks ! > Platform Version OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.8.88 Out of curiosity, do you use rhel ocd-icl libOpenCL.so (at which version ?) or the nvidia provided one ?
As shown with ldd $(which clinfo)
nvidia. libOpenCL.so.1 => /usr/local/cuda/targets/x86_64-linux/lib/libOpenCL.so.1 (0x00007f51bd000000)
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fee6f8cecf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-626622c523 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.