Description of problem: There is no build of python-pymilter for RHEL 9. Please branch and build python-pymilter for EPEL 9. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.4-17 Additional info: The current rawhide branch of this package builds successfully against `epel9`. Build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/areiter/centos-stream-9-extra/build/4751597/
*** Bug 2142747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bojan Smojver 2022-11-15 07:16:41 UTC This package is required by pypolicyd-spf (spf-engine). It is also needed for python-oletools.
created branch. Builds with fedpkg mockbuild. Fails on Fedora build system - unless I need to do something different for epel9. Do I need package.cfg?
Hello, It is hard to advice as I do not see the EPEL9 build and its error on https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=17633 What I can say based on the git, you have version 1.0.4 in the rawhide and 1.0.5 in the epel9 feature branch and this might be the problem. In general we should test new things/versions in rawhide first and not in the feature branch like epel9. Also there are possibly some version checks in the build system checking that so this might be preventing you building package in feature branch newer than version in rawhide. Please can you try with the exact same version (1.0.4) as is in the rawhide and/or possibly upgrading the rawhide version to 1.0.5 first before having that version in epel9? According the build system the 1.0.4 version build for EPEL8 so it should build for EPEL9 as well. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1349340
Also as far as I can tell the pymilter-1.0.5.tar.gz was not uploaded to fedora as a source yet. I did upload it now with fedpkg new-sources pymilter-1.0.5.tar.gz . Please note it would be still better to introduce the 1.0.5 first to rawhide branch rather than epel9.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94975870 scratch build of 1.0.5 finished just fine in epel9, so bumping it in rawhide would probably be ok. Just a glitch is that the update to 1.0.5 is probably bit older than current changelog in rawhide.
Any chance of a build for EPEL9?
I was doing a local build. I will try again. Maybe mock configs have been updated.
You are probably right about build rawhide first. I didn't think the Fedora branches affected epel.
Built locally, started build on epel9.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-488f94114c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-488f94114c
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-488f94114c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-488f94114c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-488f94114c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.