Created attachment 1907563 [details] NM trace log Description of problem: With a specific set of profiles, on boot, profiles with lower priority are used over profiles with higher priority. Bonds and OVS are involved and possibly a complicated auto-connection dependency graph, but the intended activation can be achieved manually without any issues so there is no reason NM could not achieve the same automatically on boot, so the perception form the user is that priority is being ignored. On boot, no manual intervention, this is the status: [root@fedora system-connections]# nmcli c show NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE Wired connection 1 40b0b9db-c803-3e7f-abb2-39d8593e3485 ethernet eth0 ovs-if-br-ex 4cff5623-604b-4cd0-9a5d-62915df9460c ovs-interface br-ex bond-slave-eth1 a38b0380-f8a0-4098-af0e-ece8106d4cab ethernet eth1 bond-slave-eth2 7588cca3-1cb6-4213-9b90-956aa77821c2 ethernet eth2 br-ex cf097898-974d-4ef2-a804-917a04d16090 ovs-bridge br-ex ovs-if-phys0 1141ecb1-06e5-4e55-a224-228307d3adc6 bond bond0 ovs-port-br-ex 43575ecf-f90a-464d-8843-9098a69dc599 ovs-port br-ex ovs-port-phys0 a117fb62-a338-4c42-b4a5-6f855cd82dbd ovs-port bond0 bond-bond0 a9732df4-4570-4f64-853f-f8b21d6c8a09 bond -- bond-slave-eth1-slave-ovs-clone 90e70007-17ac-496a-aae0-6f134e011314 ethernet -- bond-slave-eth2-slave-ovs-clone 7ca5b4cd-6d15-4693-a7df-1534782d9b3a ethernet -- bond-slave-eth1-slave-ovs-clone and bond-slave-eth2-slave-ovs-clone have higher priority than bond-slave-eth1 and bond-slave-eth2, can be manually activated without any issues and are expected to be activated after a reboot over bond-slave-eth1 and bond-slave-eth2. Attached connections and NM trace log Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.32.12-2.fc35 How reproducible: Always
Adding Openshift machine-config-operator PR that hit this issue for a bit more of contextual info: https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3312
Hi Jaime, can you please check the patched build without workaround? I am unable to reproduce locally (creating profiles with the same configs and correct are active even on affected version). Fernando states, that it is not that easy to reproduce, so it will be verified as sanity-only with high probably, so we would like to have the confirmation that it is fixed in affected environments. Thank you!
(In reply to Filip Pokryvka from comment #9) > Hi Jaime, > > can you please check the patched build without workaround? I am unable to > reproduce locally (creating profiles with the same configs and correct are > active even on affected version). > > Fernando states, that it is not that easy to reproduce, so it will be > verified as sanity-only with high probably, so we would like to have the > confirmation that it is fixed in affected environments. > > Thank you! I can reproduce with this vagrant box https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/35/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-35-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box I can try with the patched build if someone lets me know how to install it.