Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:

On new host details Overview page, there is an 'Installable errata' card which shows errata you can install on the host. But many customers want to see applicable errata, and even consider this more important than installable errata.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Hosts > All Hosts
2. Select a registered host
3. View the Errata overview card

Actual results:
it only shows installable errata

Expected results:
it should have the option to show applicable errata

Additional info:
this was a request from Sat 6.12 CEE enablement demo

Jeremy, do you know where the redmine for this might be? If it was fixed in 6.13 I think we can close this as CURRENTRELEASE.

It's https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/35668, attached to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138938. Maybe one of these BZs was supposed to be a clone..?

Closing as a duplicate

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2138938 ***