Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-GLUT/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-GLUT/ghc-GLUT-2.7.0.16-1.fc37.src.rpm Description: A Haskell binding for the OpenGL Utility Toolkit, a window system independent toolkit for writing OpenGL programs. For more information about the C library on which this binding is based, please see: <http://www.opengl.org/resources/libraries/glut/>. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91397938
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/GLUT
Need to check - maybe `Requires: freeglut[-devel]`?
Yes, it seems like ghc-GLUT needs freeglut, otherwise the following test fails: ``` ghci> import Graphics.UI.GLUT ghci> getArgsAndInitialize *** Exception: user error (unknown GLUT entry glutInit) ``` After installing freeglut: ``` ghci> getArgsAndInitialize freeglut (<interactive>): failed to open display '' ```
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Shouldn't the license be BSD-3-Clause? - Not sure what is the process to restore previously unmaintained package, will the fedora-review + flag process skip the creation? - Example code in the -devel package are installed in /usr/share, shouldn't they be part of the doc package? - I think the undefined-non-weak-symbol and unused-direct-shlib-dependency are caused by https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/17157 - Not sure about the debuginfo stuff, I guess that's expected for haskell libraries? - The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. Note: Not a valid SPDX expression 'BSD'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 - Package does not use a name that already exists. Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-GLUT See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [?]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Sources not installed [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License". 133 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /data/2122160-ghc- GLUT/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. (it's missing freeglut) [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Test run failed [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ghc- GLUT-prof [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1259520 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-GLUT-2.7.0.16-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm ghc-GLUT-devel-2.7.0.16-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm ghc-GLUT-prof-2.7.0.16-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm ghc-GLUT-2.7.0.16-1.fc40.src.rpm =================================================================================================================================================================================== rpmlint session starts =================================================================================================================================================================================== rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpv0n18ctc')] checks: 31, packages: 4 ghc-GLUT-devel.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/GLUT-2.7.0.16/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr.a ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/GLUT-2.7.0.16/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr_p.a ghc-GLUT.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/GLUT-2.7.0.16/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr_p.a ==================================================================================================================================================== 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings, 2 badness; has taken 1.7 s ==================================================================================================================================================== Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /lib64/libm.so.6 ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSstm-2.5.1.0-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSObjectName-1.1.0.2-1HJfhzjjDkL12SfZtm7aVw-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLURaw-2.0.0.5-8TIOBaPS6OkCUcCn5VlFpT-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSOpenGLRaw-3.3.4.1-9ek8BVjW1XUHrRnXYZKQNq-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHStransformers-0.5.6.2-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHStext-2.0.2-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHShalf-0.3.1-60qJgit6UE35Vp0WewyM9N-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSbinary-0.8.9.1-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSfixed-0.3-7m5sXaULij82zshwkLrAC2-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSbytestring-0.11.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHStemplate-haskell-2.19.0.0-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSpretty-1.1.3.6-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSghc-boot-th-9.4.5-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSdeepseq-1.4.8.0-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSghc-bignum-1.3-ghc9.4.5.so ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /lib64/libGLU.so.1 ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /lib64/libGL.so.1 ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so /lib64/libgmp.so.10 ghc-GLUT.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so stg_thawArrayzh (/usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-9.4.5/libHSghc-prim-0.9.0-ghc9.4.5.so) [snip many more undefined-non-weak-symbol] ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/GLUT-2.7.0.16/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr_p.a ghc-GLUT-devel.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/GLUT-2.7.0.16/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr.a ghc-GLUT.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/GLUT-2.7.0.16/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr_p.a 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 992 errors, 3 warnings, 992 badness; has taken 1.2 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-GLUT: /usr/lib64/ghc-9.4.5/lib/libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so Source checksums ---------------- https://hackage.haskell.org/package/GLUT-2.7.0.16/GLUT-2.7.0.16.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b6fae948d0778ee49e1199b20a007d1c4e9e7c008096fcfe6d2f7ec98974b36d CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b6fae948d0778ee49e1199b20a007d1c4e9e7c008096fcfe6d2f7ec98974b36d Requires -------- ghc-GLUT (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libHSGLURaw-2.0.0.5-8TIOBaPS6OkCUcCn5VlFpT-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSObjectName-1.1.0.2-1HJfhzjjDkL12SfZtm7aVw-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSOpenGL-3.0.3.0-Kt2Ln3aK6AU83MwPyFo0be-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSOpenGLRaw-3.3.4.1-9ek8BVjW1XUHrRnXYZKQNq-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSStateVar-1.2.2-GlWluWgK8kgE7IUHzo2idN-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.17.1.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSbinary-0.8.9.1-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.11.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHScontainers-0.6.7-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.4.8.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSfixed-0.3-7m5sXaULij82zshwkLrAC2-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSghc-bignum-1.3-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSghc-boot-th-9.4.5-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.9.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHShalf-0.3.1-60qJgit6UE35Vp0WewyM9N-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSpretty-1.1.3.6-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHSstm-2.5.1.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHStemplate-haskell-2.19.0.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHStext-2.0.2-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.5.6.2-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ghc-GLUT-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc-GLUT(x86-64) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(OpenGL-3.0.3.0-Kt2Ln3aK6AU83MwPyFo0be) ghc-devel(StateVar-1.2.2-GlWluWgK8kgE7IUHzo2idN) ghc-devel(array-0.5.4.0) ghc-devel(base-4.17.1.0) ghc-devel(containers-0.6.7) ghc-devel(transformers-0.5.6.2) ghc-GLUT-prof (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc-GLUT-devel(x86-64) ghc-prof(OpenGL-3.0.3.0-Kt2Ln3aK6AU83MwPyFo0be) ghc-prof(StateVar-1.2.2-GlWluWgK8kgE7IUHzo2idN) ghc-prof(array-0.5.4.0) ghc-prof(base-4.17.1.0) ghc-prof(containers-0.6.7) ghc-prof(transformers-0.5.6.2) Provides -------- ghc-GLUT: ghc-GLUT ghc-GLUT(x86-64) libHSGLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit) ghc-GLUT-devel: ghc-GLUT-devel ghc-GLUT-devel(x86-64) ghc-GLUT-static ghc-GLUT-static(x86-64) ghc-devel(GLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr) ghc-GLUT-prof: ghc-GLUT-prof ghc-GLUT-prof(x86-64) ghc-prof(GLUT-2.7.0.16-HKIW8XNEU3lDtY2BPwzdVr) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2122160 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Haskell, Generic Disabled plugins: Python, Perl, SugarActivity, Ocaml, fonts, Java, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
Thank you for reviewing (In reply to Tristan Cacqueray from comment #4) > - Shouldn't the license be BSD-3-Clause? Yes, sorry should have updated > - Not sure what is the process to restore previously unmaintained package, > will the fedora-review + flag process skip the creation? Right the package will have to be unretired once this package review is approved. > - Example code in the -devel package are installed in /usr/share, > shouldn't they be part of the doc package? Good catch Given the total size I wonder if it makes not sense just to remove them? hmmm > - I think the undefined-non-weak-symbol and unused-direct-shlib-dependency > are caused by https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/17157 > - Not sure about the debuginfo stuff, I guess that's expected for haskell > libraries? Yes, I thought so > ===== MUST items ===== > > C/C++: > [?]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. > Note: Sources not installed Not sure where that comes from > [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ghc- > GLUT-prof Well it is indirect though the devel package (prof -> devel -> base), but yeah it is flagged, so perhaps I should enforce it in ghc-rpm-macros... > Generic: > [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package > is arched. > Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1259520 bytes in /usr/share
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #5) > Yes, I thought so I mean "I think so"
Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-GLUT/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-GLUT/ghc-GLUT-2.7.0.16-2.fc40.src.rpm - migrate to SPDX license tag (#2122160) - runtime requires freeglut - move examples to doc subpackage (#2122160) Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106691905
Thanks!
Thanks, Tristan! I opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11691 for unretirement
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/58139 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/58140 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/58141 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/58142
FEDORA-2023-32a5725c9b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-32a5725c9b
FEDORA-2023-da9f3da210 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-da9f3da210
FEDORA-2023-dad9eea6f7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dad9eea6f7
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8cef8e4ed8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8cef8e4ed8
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8cef8e4ed8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8cef8e4ed8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-dad9eea6f7 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-dad9eea6f7 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dad9eea6f7 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-da9f3da210 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-da9f3da210 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-da9f3da210 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-32a5725c9b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-32a5725c9b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-32a5725c9b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2023-dad9eea6f7 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2023-32a5725c9b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8cef8e4ed8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2023-da9f3da210 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.