RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
RHEL9 libfido2 package version (1.6.0) is behind the EPEL8 version (1.11.0). This is generating a confusing user experience for those relying on these library.

I would at least need to have defined FIDO_DISABLE_U2F_FALLBACK, which was included upstream in https://github.com/Yubico/libfido2/commit/35966e6486f8ffca63641210b4ca878a43338602. But I may need other interfaces or definitions as the development phase continues, thus as I mentioned before, I'd prefer to update the RHEL9 version of this package to 1.11.0.

We definitely wouldn't do it for RHEL 9.0/9.1

It can be done for 9.2 if no backward compatibility is broken and nobody depends on soname 1.6.0

We are also targeting 9.2 so that sounds good.

I hope you don't mind but I set ITR to 9.2 so that we don't miss it.

I think we should target for a rebase of version 1.11.0, as previous versions contain bugs if we are to use OpenSSSL 3+.

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (libfido2 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6614

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days