RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Created attachment 1908621 [details]
screenshot of the issue

Description of problem:
rendering of mesa demos might not be fully successfull on VM with vitual graphic card like QXL resulting in partially rendered mesa demos images or even not rendered at all.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mesa-22.1.5-1.el9

How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. open mesa demo (FE dlist-dangling )

This just missed being pushed for RHEL9 due to branching happening at the end of ITM 25, and ended up in 26 land and needs exception now.

The big reason two reasons for wanting this in, is it's in RHEL 8 already since that process wasn't broken by branching, and we should keep 8/9 synced here to avoid diveregences.

and it's a regression.

Otherwise I don't think I can get "business or customer" buy-in for it.

Tested on amd nvidia intel and qxl, no problem found, issue is fixed.

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (libdrm and mesa bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2022:8157