Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 2122923

Summary: members without subnet wrongly associated to VIP subnet
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Fernando Royo <froyo>
Component: python-networking-ovnAssignee: Luis Tomas Bolivar <ltomasbo>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fiorella Yanac <fyanac>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 16.2 (Train)CC: apevec, egarciar, jlibosva, lhh, majopela, scohen
Target Milestone: z4Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: 16.2 (Train on RHEL 8.4)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-networking-ovn-7.4.2-2.20220409154863.el8ost Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 2122925 2122926 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-07 19:24:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2122925, 2122926    

Description Fernando Royo 2022-08-31 09:59:12 UTC
Description of problem:

When members are added without subnet_id information, the ovn-octavia provider used the VIP subnet for the subnet_id. However, if the member does not belong to the same subnet as the VIP subnet (i.e., different cidr), the API does not return any error but there is no connectivity to the member (as it does not belong to the obtained subnet).

An extra checking to ensure the VIP CIDR includes the member IP should be done.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2022-12-07 19:24:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Release of components for Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2.4), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:8794