Bug 2124370 - request epel 9 branch for glpk
Summary: request epel 9 branch for glpk
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: glpk
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Davide Cavalca
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG 2121164
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2022-09-05 21:29 UTC by Tom Rix
Modified: 2022-09-26 01:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glpk-5.0-6.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2022-09-26 01:47:53 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tom Rix 2022-09-05 21:29:55 UTC
Description of problem:
octave BuildRequires glpk-devel
see line 95

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
cherry pick fix for finding mysql.h from
to rawhide

fedpkg srpm

fedpkg scratch-build --target epel9 --srpm glpk-5.0-6.fc38.src.rpm

Actual results:
Use in a local octave rpmbuild on rhel 9, no failures

Expected results:

Additional info:
Add me as a project admin if you need help with epel

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-09-15 21:14:54 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build glpk in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.

Comment 2 Tom Rix 2022-09-15 21:37:31 UTC
I am not sure what you mean, I want to get octave working on epel9, this is one of several dependencies I am working to enable of epel9.  octave can work without it, but it would be good if the rawhide and epel9 octave specfiles matched when the epel9 branch was cut.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-09-16 13:03:54 UTC
Apologies for the confusion, my comment was directed to the bug assignee and current maintainer of this package (Conrad Meyer). I also need glpk in epel9, in my case for ppl (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121164).

Comment 4 Tom Rix 2022-09-16 17:20:14 UTC
Ok. We are both offering to help and both have blockers needing this package.  I have collected a couple of new packages in the quest for octave support, I do not mind one more.  I also don't mind if someone else wants to do the work. Like a lot of packages it mostly works as-is on rhel 9.

Comment 5 Jerry James 2022-09-16 17:56:23 UTC
I have added @epel-packagers-sig.org as a collaborator with access to all epel* branches.  I'll take responsibility if the primary maintainer is not happy with this action.

Comment 6 Jerry James 2022-09-16 17:57:21 UTC
Not sure where that needinfo flag came from.  I'll see if I can clear it....

Comment 7 Davide Cavalca 2022-09-16 18:26:11 UTC
Thank you! Branch requested:

$ fedpkg request-branch epel9

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-09-17 05:45:35 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-09-18 02:35:32 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-09-26 01:47:53 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.