RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:

[root@rhel86 ~]#  semanage fcontext -a -t passwd_file_t -s system_u /etc/security/opasswd
ValueError: Le contexte du fichier pour /etc/security/opasswd n'est pas défini
[root@rhel86 ~]# export LANG=ENG
[root@rhel86 ~]#  semanage fcontext -a -t passwd_file_t -s system_u /etc/security/opasswd
ValueError: File context for /etc/security/opasswd already defined


In French, it should be: "Le contexte du fichier pour /etc/security/opasswd est déjà défini" and NOT "n'est pas défini", which means: is not defined
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL 8.6
policycoreutils-python-utils-2.9-19.el8.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. set language is French
2. try to add a label already existing
3.

Actual results:
Wrong error message

Expected results:
Error message:
"Le contexte du fichier pour /etc/security/opasswd est déjà défini"

Additional info:

Thank you for reporting the issue. Would you mind fixing the translation in https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=6741cf68c39c17b9&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition (rhel 8) and https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/python/fr/?checksum=6741cf68c39c17b9&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition (Fedora and Rhel 9)?

It seems that other occurrences of "already defined" are mostly translated to "est déjà définie", or "existe déjà":
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=716953929af86ea&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=9eed9f183a88ca8&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=38bf3470cef443e6&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=ccc71a5cb3f5ac2&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=2ca57b137e498ee&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=72489bc8eff4e756&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/translate/selinux/rhel8python/fr/?checksum=4ab7c6d76ad3f7d6&q=already+defined&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition

Is that correct?

Yes, that's correct.

I translated it in https://translate.fedoraproject.org/

Thank you !

Benoit

Thank you.
I didn't find any changes in the translation repo from you so I changed it based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124826#c0 
See:
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/selinux/#history

Thanks, I certainly did'nt go to the end of the process ...

The fix should be available in rhel 8.8 and 9.1.

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (policycoreutils bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:3034